|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈兴东,万婷婷,段满林,等.地佐辛预防和治疗腹部手术患者苏醒期躁动的观察[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2011,13(04):324-326.
 CHEN Xing-dong,WAN Ting-ting,DUAN Man-lin,et al.The observation of dezocine on prevention and treatment of emergence agitation after abdomen surgery[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2011,13(04):324-326.
点击复制

地佐辛预防和治疗腹部手术患者苏醒期躁动的观察()

《医学研究与战创伤救治》(原医学研究生学报)[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第13卷
期数:
2011年04期
页码:
324-326
栏目:
出版日期:
2011-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The observation of dezocine on prevention and treatment of emergence agitation after abdomen surgery
文章编号:
1672-271X(2011)04-0324-03
作者:
陈兴东1万婷婷2段满林2李伟彦2
1.211131 江苏南京,南京军区南京总医院疗养区;2.210002 江苏南京,南京军区南京总医院麻醉科
Author(s):
CHEN Xing-dong1WAN Ting-ting2DUAN Man-lin2LI Wei-yan2
1.Sanitarial District,2.Department of Anesthesiology,Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210002,China
关键词:
地佐辛麻醉苏醒期躁动腹部手术
Keywords:
dezocine recovery period emergence agitation abdomen surgery
分类号:
R614.24
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨地佐辛在预防和治疗全麻患者苏醒期躁动的有效性及安全性。方法 ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级的择期腹部手术120 例,随机双盲分为三组,每组40 例,即地佐辛组、芬太尼组和对照组 。在缝合皮肤前静脉注射拟观察的药物,观察患者在拔管即刻和在术后恢复室的躁动及镇静评分、药物不良反应、拔管时间及缓解情况等,对照组患者若发生躁动则静脉注射地佐辛0.1 mg /kg。结果 三组患者在拔管时间及苏醒时间差异无统计学意义,对照组拔管后躁动的发生率明显高于芬太尼组及地佐辛组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。地佐辛组的镇静评分较高,但没有过度镇静或苏醒延迟的发生,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在术后恢复室芬太尼组追加芬太尼后躁动缓解率为43.8%(7/16),而地佐辛组追加地佐辛后躁动缓解率为100.0%(6/6)。对照组发生躁动的患者经静脉注射地佐辛后躁动缓解或减轻率为76.0%(19/25),芬太尼组7例追加芬太尼后有3例出现一过性的呼吸抑制,而地佐辛组及对照组均无呼吸抑制的发生。结论 地佐辛是预防和治疗腹部手术患者全麻苏醒期躁动的理想药物,优于芬太尼。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of dezocine on prevention of emergence agitation in adult patients during recovery period after abdomen surgery.Methods 120 ASAⅠ-Ⅱ patients scheduled for elective abdomen surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups: group D with dezocine,group F with fentanyl and group N with saline.Dezocine 0.1 mg /kg,fentanyl 1 μg/kg and 1 ml saline were administered intravenous respectively just before the beginning of skin suturing.The incidence of emergence agitation,restlessness and sedation scale,extubate and recovery time,emergence agitation anesis,and adverse events were evaluated.Results No significant statistic differences have been showed in extubate and recovery time between group D,group F and Group N (P<0.01).The incidence of emergence agitation was significantly higher in group N than that in group F and group D (P<0.01).The sedation scale was higher in group D without excess sedation and palinesthesia delayed.When another bolus was administered intravenous,the emergence agitation remitted significantly in group D 6/6 (100.0%) and group N 19/25 (76%) than in group F 7/16 (43.8%),but respiratory depression was very common in group F.Conclusion Benefit from the analgesic and sedative property of dezocine,it could be one of the ideal drugs to prevent and relieve emergence agitation in the patients after abdomen surgery with less frequent adverse events.Fentanyl can not prevent and relieve emergence agitation effectively.

参考文献/References:

[1]Commiskey S,Fan LW,Ho IK,et al.Butorphanol: effects of a prototypical agonist- antagonist analgesic on kappa- opioid receptors[J].Pharmacol Sci,2005,98(2): 109-116.
[2]Cravero JP,Beach M,Thyr B,et al.The effect of small dose fentanyl on the emergence characteristics of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery[J].Anesth Analg,2003,97(2): 364-367.
[3]杜炎芳.喷他佐辛预防瑞芬太尼全麻患者苏醒期躁动的临床观察[J].现代实用医学,2009,21(7):743.
[4]刘东武,牟洪善.μ型阿片受体研究进展[J].生命科学仪器,2006,4(2):22-24.
[5]Cohen IT,Finkel JC,Hannallah RS,et al.Rapid emergency does not explainagitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and children: a comparison with propofol[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2003,13(1):63-67.
[6]张科军.全身麻醉后拔管期间躁动的原因及处理[J].中国实用医学研究杂志,2004,3(3):273.
[7]佟波涛,赵建生. 围手术期应用氟比洛芬酯对舒芬太尼用于妇科肿瘤术后镇痛的影响[J].东南国防医药,2010,12(2):117-119.
[8]陈兴东,段满林,李伟彦,等.腰-硬联合麻醉对肾移植术患者血流动力学的影响[J].东南国防医药,2009,11(6):539-540.
[9]Shoichi U,Takahisa G,Katsuo T,et al.Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients[J].Anesth Analg,2000,91(8): 563- 566.
[10]Cravero J,Surgenor S,Whalen K.Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane [J].Paediatr Anaesth,2000,10(4): 419-424.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈兴东,万婷婷,李 茜,等.地佐辛与曲马多治疗剖宫产术中寒战的对比研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2013,15(03):249.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.03.014]
 CHEN Xing-dong,WAN Ting-ting,LI Qian,et al.Comparison of dezocineand tramadol on shivering during cesaearn section surgery under combined-spinal epidural anaesthesia[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2013,15(04):249.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.03.014]
[2]钱志峰,毛发江,徐磊,等.右美托咪定联合地佐辛镇痛方案对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的镇痛、炎性细胞因子及术后认知功能的影响探究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2017,19(02):187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2017.02.019]
[3]陈鹤,舒振云,陈英英,等.地佐辛与酮咯酸氨丁三醇在颈髓过伸伤的镇痛效果比较[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2017,19(03):264.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2017.03.011]
 CHEN He,SHU Zhen-yun,CHEN Ying-ying,et al.Analgesic effect of dezocine and ketorolac tromethamine in patients with different degree of pain in the cervical spinal cord extension injury[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2017,19(04):264.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2017.03.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-07-20