|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘俊松,熊 波,唐艳超,等.飞行人员疲劳状况与应对方式的相关性研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2012,14(01):9-11.
 LIU Jun-song,XIONG Bo,TANG Yan-chao,et al.A related study on fatigue and coping style in flight personnel[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2012,14(01):9-11.
点击复制

飞行人员疲劳状况与应对方式的相关性研究()

《医学研究与战创伤救治》(原医学研究生学报)[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第14卷
期数:
2012年01期
页码:
9-11
栏目:
出版日期:
2012-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A related study on fatigue and coping style in flight personnel
文章编号:
1672-271X(2012)01-0009-03
作者:
刘俊松熊 波唐艳超张 舜
310002 浙江杭州,南京军区杭州疗养院海勤疗养区
Author(s):
LIU Jun-songXIONG BoTANG Yan-chaoZHANG Shun.
Naval Convalescent Zone,Hangzhou Sanatorium,Nanjing Military Command,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310002,China
关键词:
飞行人员疲劳应对方式
Keywords:
flight personnel fatigue coping style
分类号:
R852
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨飞行人员疲劳状况及其与应对方式的相关性。方法 用疲劳评定量表(FAI)和特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)对559名飞行人员进行量表测评,数据采用SPSS15.0软件包进行统计分析。结果 飞行人员在疲劳的严重程度上与健康组比较差异无统计学意义,而明显低于慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)组(P<0.01);不同战机飞行人员在疲劳的严重程度(P<0.01)和情境特异性(P<0.01)方面差异具有统计学意义,其中轰炸机人员的疲劳程度显著高于歼击机人员,情境特异性显著高于运输机人员;不同专业飞行人员在情境特异性方面差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),其中机械师在疲劳的情境特异性方面明显偏低;飞行人员疲劳的严重程度与积极应对方式呈显著负相关(r=-0.19),与消极应对方式呈显著正相关(r=0.41)。结论 飞行人员疲劳状况及特点与应对方式密切相关。
Abstract:
Objective To study the situation of fatigue and its relationship with coping style in flight personnel.Methods Five hundred and fifty nine flight personnel were evaluated by fatigue assessment instrument (FAI) and trait coping style questionnaire (TCSQ).Data were analyzed with SPSS 15.0.Results The severity of fatigue in flight personnel had no statistical significance between the healthy group,but was significantly lower than the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) group(P<0.01).There was statistical significance among helicopters,transports,fighters,bombers in the severity of fatigue(P<0.01) and situation-specificity (P<0.01) of FAI.The severity of fatigue in bombers was higher than in fighters,the situation-specificity in bombers was higher than in transports.There was statistical significance among pilots,navigators,correspondent,mechanics in the situation-specificity(P<0.01) of FAI,the situation-specificity in mechanics was lower than other professionals.The severity of fatigue in flight personnel was negatively correlated with positive coping (r=-0.19) and positively correlated with negative coping (r=0.41).Conclusion Conditions and characteristics of fatigue were closely correlated with coping style in flight personnel.

参考文献/References:

[1]王天芳,张翠珍.疲劳评定量表[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(特刊):59-60.
[2]汪向东,王希林,马 弘.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999(增刊):120-122.
[3]王天芳,张翠珍,刘雁峰,等.慢性疲劳综合征病人的疲劳、抑郁、焦虑与生活事件的特点及其相关行分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2000,9(2):84-86.
[4]Barofsky I,West Legro M.Definition and measurement of fatigue[J].Rev Infec Dis,1991,13(suppl 1):894-897.
[5]Jan H,Vercoulen MM,Caroline MA,et al.Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome[J].J Psychosom Res,1994,38(5):383-392.
[6]Chalder T,Bereiowitz G,Pawlikowska T,et al.Development of a fatigue scale[J].J Psychosom Res,1993,37(2):147-153.
[7]Schwartz JE,Jandorf Lina,Krupp LB,et al.The measurement of fatigue:a new instrument[J].J Psychosom Res,1993,37(7):753-762.
[8]葛盛秋,武国城,金兰军,等.飞行疲劳与年龄因素的关系[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2002,13(2):108.
[9]韩文强,胡文东,文治洪,等.飞行疲劳的生理心理因素及对策[J].第四军医大学学报,2008,29(4):379-381.
[10]姚建明.浅析飞行疲劳的生理原因与对策[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2004,15(6):10-12.
[11]冯正直,杨国愉,任 辉,等.军事应激条件下军人个性特征和应对方式及心理健康的关系研究[J].第四军医大学学报,2004,25(22):2079-2082.
[12]熊 波,刘俊松,斯银平,等.437名潜艇官兵心理应激影响因素的路径分析[J].东南国防医药,2008,10(4):243-247.
[13]Beutler LE,Moos RH.Coping and coping styles in personality and treatment planning:introduction to the special series[J].J Clin Psychol,2003,59(10):1045.

相似文献/References:

[1]牛程麟,王新颖,金 丽,等.体能增进剂对高强度运动战士疲劳程度的影响[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2011,13(03):206.
 NIU Cheng-lin,WANG Xin-ying,JIN Li,et al.The impacts of the agents for enhancing physical on the fatigue of soldiers in high-intensity training[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2011,13(01):206.
[2]金 玲,庞增亿,金 晶.2004~2008年飞行人员腹部超声检查结果对比分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2010,12(01):60.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
南京军区医药卫生“十一五”课题(09MA106)
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-01-20