|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周 红,许 文,陈小娥.瘢痕疙瘩同位素治疗方法的临床研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2013,15(04):368-370，392.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.04.016]
　ZHOU Hong,XU Wen,CHEN Xiao-e.The clinical observation on the effects of four methods in the treatment of keloid[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2013,15(04):368-370，392.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.04.016]
点击复制

瘢痕疙瘩同位素治疗方法的临床研究()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年04期
页码:
368-370，392
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The clinical observation on the effects of four methods in the treatment of keloid
作者:
周 红1; 许 文2; 陈小娥1
1.210002 江苏南京,解放军81医院皮肤科; 2. 210028 江苏南京,武警江苏总队南京医院皮肤科
Author(s):
ZHOU Hong1; XU Wen2; CHEN Xiao-e1
1.Department of Dermatology,81 Hospital of PLA,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210002,China; 2.Department of Dermatology,Nanjing Hospital of Jiangsu Province Corps,Chinese People's Armed Police Forces,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210028,China
关键词:
瘢痕疙瘩;  综合疗法;  回顾性分析
Keywords:
keloid;  treatment;  retrospective analysis
分类号:
R619.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.04.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨瘢痕疙瘩四种疗法的治疗效果、不良反应。方法 2003年3月-2011年2月治疗的359例瘢痕疙瘩进行回顾性分析。将符合本研究方案要求的患者分成4组,A组手术联合同位素治疗、B组醋酸曲安奈德局部注射联合同位素治疗、C组二氧化碳激光磨削术联合同位素治疗、D组单一同位素治疗。对比分析4组疗效、不良反应的差异。结果 4组总有效率分别为91.2%、93.5%、95.1%、68.4%。不良反应均较轻,其中A组4例,B组5例,C组6例,D组7例。结论 4组疗法均有较好的疗效,其中前3组综合治疗总有效率较高。说明同位素治疗在瘢痕疙瘩中仍不失为一种可取的方法。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the differences of the four treatments of keloid by comparing the treatment effects and sides effects.Methods 359 cases from March 2003 to February 2011 had been under analysis.These selected cases were divided into four groups.Group A(operation with 32P beta ray irradiation),group B(triamcinolone injection with 32P beta ray irradiation),group C(the carbon dioxide laser excision with 32P beta ray irradiation),group D(32P beta ray irradiation only),for the purpose of comparative analysis of the treatment effect,side effect of the four treatments of keloid.Results The rate of the treatment effects of the groups were respectively 91.2%,93.5%,95.1%,68.4%.Side effects of the four treatments were slight.Conclusion These four treatments are all with good effects.The three synthetical treatments of keloid have higher total effective rates.

参考文献/References:

[1] Shih B,Bayat A.Genetics of keloid scarring[J].Arch dermatol Res,2010,302(5):319-339.
[2] 蔡景龙.现代瘢痕学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:320-335.
[3] 季 江,王 焱.瘢痕疙瘩发病机制的研究进展[J].国际皮肤性病学杂志,2012,38(3):179-182.
[4] Hanahan D,Weinberg RA.Hallmarks of cancer:the next generation[J].Cell,2011,144(5):646-674.
[5] Kutzner J,Schneider L,Seegenschmiedt MH.Radiotherapy of keloids patterns of care study-results[J].Strahlenther Onkol,2003,179(1):54-58.
[6] 徐 娟,贺 勤,陈加媛,等.90锶对瘢痕疙瘩成纤维细胞增殖和凋亡的影响[J].皮肤性病诊疗学杂志,2011,18(2):91-93.
[7] Stadelmann WL,Digenis AG,Tobin GR.Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds[J].Am J Surg,1998,176(2A Suppl):26-38.
[8] 李 虎,李小静,高风山,等.瘢痕微血管的研究治疗进展[J].整形再造外科杂志,2005,2(1):42-48.
[9] 张奇亮.敷贴治疗核医学[M].济南:济南出版社,2004:26.
[10] 李新枝,夏延毅,常冬姝,等.三种不同方法治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效比较[J].中国美容医学,2011,20(6):949-951.
[11] Mutalik S.Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars[J].Indian J Dermatol venereol Leprol,2005,71(1):3-8.
[12] 冯先才,张 平,袁玉明,等.点阵激光联合32磷敷贴治疗瘢痕疙瘩疗效观察[J].中国美容整形外科杂志,2012,23(2):75-77.

相似文献/References:

[1]严道金,杨海平.巨大型瘢痕疙瘩治疗1例报告与文献复习[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2008,10(01):29.
　YAN Dao-jin,YANG Hai-ping.Therapy for rare enormous keloid: a case report and literature review[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2008,10(04):29.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-08-05