[1]卫秀洋,董卫星,陈勇忠,等.腰椎后路单节段融合与非融合固定的对比分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2015,17(01):35-37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.01.011]
WEI Xiu-yang,DONG Wei-xing,CHEN Yong-zhong,et al.Posterior single segment fusion or non-fusion in treatment of lu mbar spinal disease:a comparative study[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(01):35-37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.01.011]
点击复制
腰椎后路单节段融合与非融合固定的对比分析(
)
WEI Xiu-yang,DONG Wei-xing,CHEN Yong-zhong,et al.Posterior single segment fusion or non-fusion in treatment of lu mbar spinal disease:a comparative study[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(01):35-37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.01.011]
)《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]
- 卷:
- 第17卷
- 期数:
- 2015年01期
- 页码:
- 35-37
- 栏目:
- 出版日期:
- 2015-01-31
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Posterior single segment fusion or non-fusion in treatment of lu mbar spinal disease:a comparative study
- Keywords:
- lumbar spinal disease; lumbar spinal stenosis; fusion; non-fusion; adjacent segment degeneration
- 分类号:
- R687.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 目的 比较融合与非融合术治疗腰椎单节段退变性疾病的临床疗效及其对相邻节段的影响。方法 2011年5月-2012年6月，收集49例，按手术方法不同分两组，观察组21例使用弹性棒非融合固定术，对照组28例椎间融合固定术。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale，VAS)评价临床疗效，并通过X线片测量腰椎各间隙高度。结果 所有病例均随访16～34个月，平均26.7个月，两组末次随访时VAS 评分较术前都明显降低，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后1周时VAS 评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组末次随访时上、下位节段椎间隙高度与术前比较退变不显著，差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)；对照组上、下位节段椎间隙高度末次随访时与术前比较减少明显，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 融合与非融合固定治疗单间隙腰椎退变性都取得较好的临床疗效，非融合术会降低相邻节段退变的发生。
- Abstract:
- Objective To compare the treatment effects on posterior single segment fusion and non-fusion in lumbar spinal disease， and to evaluate their influence on adjacent segments. Methods From May 2011 to June 2012， a total of 49 cases of degenerative lumbar spinal disorders were treated. 21 patients undergoing non-fusion were classified as study group and 28 patients undergoing conventional fusion were as controls. The clinical effect was evaluated by visual analogue scale (visual analog scale， VAS). The intervertebral height was measured by X-ray film. Results All patients were followed up 16-34 months (mean， 26.7 months). The VAS score was significantly decreased compared with preoperative last follow-up (P<0.05). No significant difference of VAS score was found in two groups in early stage (P>0.05). In non-fusion group， there was no statistical difference in the intervertebral height of the adjacent segment between the last follow up postoperation and preoperative (P>0.05). In fusion group， the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Both fusion and non-fusion fixation have satisfying effects in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disorder. Non-fusion fixation could reduce adjacent segment degeneration.
参考文献/References:
［1］王 孟，李 坤，王 飞，等.非融合技术与腰椎融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的早期疗效观察［J］．临床骨科杂志，2012，15(1):10-12.
［2］徐海栋，付 强.后路 Isobar 非融合内固定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病疗效分析［J］．中国矫形外科杂志，2013，21(11):1149-1152.
［3］江丽强，岳亚玲，李建伟，等，椎弓根钉棒弹性固定和坚强固定对腰椎管狭窄症疗效的对比观察［J］．颈腰痛杂志，2014，35(3):232-233.
［4］夏子寰，伍 骥，郑 超，等.精准减压和非融合技术与传统融合手术治疗老年节段性腰椎管狭窄的短期临床效果比较［J］．中国矫形外科杂志，2013，21(11):1073-1080．
［5］王 会，牛国旗.腰椎棘突间非融合技术的发展现状［J］．医学综述，2013，19(19):3547-3550.
［6］李永超，彭宝淦.非融合技术在腰椎退行性疾病中的临床应用［J］．脊柱外科杂志，2014，12(1):51-54.
［7］曾昭池，郭中凯，朱志勇，等.融合与非融合术固定治疗腰椎单节段退变性疾病的临床观察［J］．中国矫形外科杂志，2013，21(1):34-36.
［8］孙义忠，刘宝平，何 强，等.融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎退行性病［J］．实用临床医药杂志，2012，6(17):74-76.
［9］隋吉生，张绍东，吴小涛，等.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术的有限元分析［J］．东南国防医药，2014，16(2):141-152.
［10］刘 伟，王 杰，蔡凯文.Cosmic 动态非融合系统治疗腰椎退变性疾病的短期疗效分析［J］．中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2013，28(7):620-622.
［11］ Aota Y，Kumano K，Hirabayashi S.Post fusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degeneration lumbar spinal disorder［J］.J Spinal Disord，1995，6(13):464-473.
［12］陈肇辉，付 强，王 聪，等.腰椎后路单节段融合与非融合固定的对比分析［J］．中国矫形外科杂志，2010，18(8):628-630.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- -
常用功能
统计/Statistics
- 摘要浏览/Viewed828
- 全文下载/Downloads495
- 评论/Comments
