|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]牛冬梅,周万青,洪 骏,等.自动化药敏系统与K-B纸片扩散法在肠杆菌科细菌中对阿米卡星药敏结果差异的探讨[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2015,17(02):131-134，187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.02.006]
　NIU Dong-mei,ZHOU Wan-qing,et al.Investigation of the susceptibility difference between automation systems and K-B disk diffusion method in Enterobacteriaceae to amikacin[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(02):131-134，187.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.02.006]
点击复制

自动化药敏系统与K-B纸片扩散法在肠杆菌科细菌中对阿米卡星药敏结果差异的探讨()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2015年02期
页码:
131-134，187
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-04-22

文章信息/Info

Title:
Investigation of the susceptibility difference between automation systems and K-B disk diffusion method in Enterobacteriaceae to amikacin
作者:
牛冬梅1; 2; 周万青3; 洪 骏2; 陈 云1
1.210029 江苏南京，南京医科大学免疫学系；2.210002 江苏南京，南京军区南京总医院全军临床检验医学研究所；3.210008 江苏南京，南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院检验科
Author(s):
NIU Dong-mei1;  2;  ZHOU Wan-qing3;  HONG Jun2;  CHEN Yun1.
1. Department of Immunization， NJMU， Nanjing， Jiangsu 210029， China； 2. Institute of Laboratory Medicine， Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region， PLA， Nanjing， Jiangsu 210002， China； 3. Laboratory Medicine， Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School， Nanjing， Jiangsu 210008， China
关键词:
阿米卡星; 自动化系统; 双圈; K-B纸片法; 肠杆菌科
Keywords:
amikacin;  automation systems;  double zone drug resistance;  K-B disk diffusion;  Enterobacteriaceae
分类号:
R446.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.02.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨自动化微生物药敏系统与K-B纸片扩散法对阿米卡星（AMK）药敏结果的差异。方法 收集临床K-B纸片扩散法对AMK敏感、完全耐药及双圈耐药的肠杆菌科细菌分别为4株、4株和13株；其中大肠埃希菌12株，肺炎克雷伯菌8株，产气肠杆菌1株；分别采用Vitek-2 Compact、Phoenix和MicroScan药敏系统对以上菌株进行AMK的复核，并采用琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌药物浓度（MIC）值。采用PCR方法检测氨基糖苷类修饰酶基因、整合子及16S rRNA甲基化酶相关基因。结果 三种自动化药敏系统对于敏感及完全耐药菌株的药物敏感性结果与K-B纸片扩散法相符；对于在K-B纸片扩散法中呈双圈耐药13株菌，Phoenix和MicroScan药敏系统结果均为耐药（>32 mg/L）；而Vitek 2 Compact药敏卡出现不同结果，其中4株菌株为敏感（≤16 mg/L），4株为中介（32 mg/L），5株为耐药（≥64 mg/L）；琼脂稀释法结果显示双圈耐药表型菌株的MIC均>512 mg/L。所测菌株携带不同的氨基糖苷类修饰酶基因及整合子基因盒，主要为aac（6’）-Ⅰ和aadA5-dfrA17；双圈耐药表型菌株均扩增出armA基因，而敏感菌株和完全耐药菌株均未扩增出该基因。结论 在K-B纸片扩散法中出现对AMK呈双圈耐药结果时，自动化鉴定药敏系统中的Vitek系统可能会产生偏差，造成这种差异的出现可能与菌株产armA基因相关。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the susceptibility difference between automation systems and K-B disk diffusion methods in Enterobacteriaceae to amikacin. Methods The strains which showed sensitive (4 isolates)， resistant (4 isolates) and double zone resistant (13 isolates) to amikacin on clinical K-B disk diffusion method were collected， and including 12 strains of E. coli， 8 strains of K. pheumoniae and 1 strain of Enterobacter aerogenes. The susceptibility to amikacin was tested with Vitek-2 Compact， Phoenix and MicroScan systems respectively， and the MICs to amikacin were detected by agar dilution method. The aminoglycoside modifying genes， integron and 16S rRNA methylases genes were determined by using PCR and DNA sequence analysis. Results The susceptibility to amikacin was consistent between three kinds of automation systems and K-B disk diffusion method for the sensitive and resistant group strains. The susceptibility results of the 13 strains which showed double zone resistant in disk diffusion method were resistant in Phoenix and MicroScan systems (>32 mg/L)， while different results were shown in Vitek-2 Compact system， including 4 strains of sensitive (≤16 mg/L)， 4 strains of intermediary (32 mg/L) and 5 strains of resistant (≥64 mg/L). The MICs were all above of 512 mg/L for the double zone resistant strains in the agar dilution method. The isolates carried different aminoglycoside modification genes and gene box of integron with the main were aac(6')-Ⅰand aadA5-dfrA17 respectively. All the strains with double zone resistant to amikacin were positive for armA and the control strains were negative. Conclusion The Vitek-2 Compact system might not be suitable for the detection of susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae with the double zone resistant to amikacin in the K-B method. The double zone drug resistance of Enterobacteriaceae to amikacin was correlated with the expression of 16S rRNA methylase armA.

参考文献/References:

［1］Vakulenko SB，Mobashery S.Versatility of aminoglycosides and prospects for their future［J］.Clin Microbiol Rev，2003，16(3)：430-450.
［2］段建春，吕晓菊.革兰氏阴性菌对氨基糖苷类抗生素耐药机制的研究进展［J］.中国抗生素杂志，2004，29(6)：329-331.
［3］吴 琼，倪语星.一种新的氨基糖苷类耐药决定因子：质粒介导的16S rRNA甲基化酶［J］.微生物与感染，2009，4(1)：45-48.
［4］陈 辉，李 翔，伍 勇，等.革兰阴性菌中整合子携带氨基糖苷类耐药基因的分布［J］.临床检验杂志，2009，27(4)：248-251.
［5］邓进进，邵海枫，王卫萍，等.鲍曼不动杆菌对氨基糖苷类抗菌药物双圈耐药现象的初步探讨［J］.临床检验杂志，2008，26(2)：90-92.
［6］张晓文，邵海枫，王卫萍，等.导致氨基糖苷类药物双圈耐药型鲍曼不动杆菌的相关携带基因研究［J］.临床检验杂志，2011，29(1)：19-21.
［7］Jung S，Yu JK，Shin SH，et al.False susceptibility to amikacin by VITEK 2 in acinetobacter baumannii harboring armA［J］.Ann Clin Lab Sci，2010，40(2)：167-171.
［8］周万青，沈 瀚，宁明哲，等.肠杆菌科细菌对阿米卡星双圈耐药机制探讨［J］.临床检验杂志，2013，31(7)：490-493.
［9］周万青，沈 瀚，宁明哲，等.导致阿米卡星双圈耐药肠杆菌科细菌耐药性研究［J］.检验医学，2013，28(11)：1012-1015.
［10］周 军，史伟峰，糜祖煌.肺炎克雷伯菌β-内酰胺酶、氨基糖苷类修饰酶、氯已啶-磺胺耐药基因研究［J］.中国抗生素杂志，2007，32(10)：627-630.
［11］黄支密，糜祖煌，储秋菊，等.肺炎克雷伯菌临床分离株中出现16S rRNA 甲基化酶基因rmtB［J］.中华流行病学杂志，2008，29(9)：909-914.
［12］Akers KS，Chaney C，Barsoumian A，et al.Aminoglycoside resistance and susceptibility testing errors in acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex［J］.J Clin Microbiol，2010，48(4)：1132-1138.
［13］Labbate M，Case，RJ，Stokes HW.The integron/gene cassstte system：an active player in bacterial adaptation［J］.Methods Mol Biol，2009，532：103-125.
［14］张跃进，常清利，汪 倩，等.临床分离肺炎克雷伯菌I类整合子的结构与功能［J］.遗传，2014，36(6)：603-610.
［15］Gilad J，Giladi M，Poch F，et al.“All-in-one-plate” E-test and disk diffusion susceptibility co-testing for multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii［J］.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis，2006，25：799-802.
［16］Gilad J，Schwartz D.Need for verification of imipenem (IPM)，meropenem (MER) and amikacin (AK) VITEK-2 susceptibility results for Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab)［C］ 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.Washington，DC，2008：Abstract D-284.
［17］杨 燕，孙长贵，陈 坚，等.用改良Hodge试验检测产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科细菌［J］.东南国防医药，2011，13(3)：223-225.
［18］石晓卉，刘 琪，于湘友.外科重症监护室临床细菌分布及耐药性监测［J］.东南国防医药，2014，16(4)：349-352.
［19］冯俊明，肖光夏，夏培元，等.烧伤创面的细菌分离及其耐药性的初步分析［J］.华南国防医学杂志，2011，25(1)：32-34.
［20］Stone ND，O’Hara CM，Williams PP，et al.Comparison of disk diffusion，Vitek 2，and broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae［J］.J Clin Microbiol，2007，45(2)：340-346.
［21］Jang W，Park YJ，Park KG，et al.Evaluation of MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 for determination of the susceptibility of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to cefepime，cefotaxime and ceftazidime［J］.J Antimicrob Chemother，2013，68(10)：2282-2285.
［22］Lee SY，Shin JH，Lee K，et al.Comparison of the Vitek 2，MicroScan，and Etest methods with the agar dilution method in assessing colistin susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Acinetobacter species from a Korean university hospital［J］.J Clin Microbiol，2013，51(6)：1924-1926.
［23］Sader HS，Fritsche TR，Jones RN.Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway，VITEK，and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents［J］.J Clin Microbiol，2006，44(3)：1101-1104.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-20