|±¾ÆÚĿ¼/Table of Contents|

[1]À÷,ËïÒ»ÎÄ,¼Ö Åô,µÈ.¸Îϸ°ûÔ´ÐԸΰ©PET-CT³ÉÏñ±ê×¼ÉãÈ¡ÖµÓëÆÏÌÑÌÇתÔ˵°°×1µÄ¹Øϵ[J].ҽѧÑо¿ÓëÕ½´´É˾ÈÖÎ(ԭҽѧÑо¿Éúѧ±¨),2015,17(06):572-574590.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.06.004]
¡¡LI Ai-mei,SUN Yi-wen,JIA Peng,et al.Relationship of standardized uptake value of PET-CT imaging and glucose transporter 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH ¡ªCOMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(06):572-574590.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.06.004]
µã»÷¸´ÖÆ

¸Îϸ°ûÔ´ÐԸΰ©PET-CT³ÉÏñ±ê×¼ÉãÈ¡ÖµÓëÆÏÌÑÌÇתÔ˵°°×1µÄ¹Øϵ()

¡¶Ò½Ñ§Ñо¿ÓëÕ½´´É˾ÈÖΡ·£¨Ô­Ò½Ñ§Ñо¿Éúѧ±¨£©[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

¾í:
µÚ17¾í
ÆÚÊý:
2015Äê06ÆÚ
Ò³Âë:
572-574590
À¸Ä¿:
³ö°æÈÕÆÚ:
2015-12-15

ÎÄÕÂÐÅÏ¢/Info

Title:
Relationship of standardized uptake value of PET-CT imaging and glucose transporter 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma
×÷Õß:
À÷ËïÒ»ÎÄ¼Ö Åô¹ùÍò»ª
210008 ½­ËÕÄϾ©£¬ÄϾ©´óѧҽѧԺ¸½ÊôÄϾ©¹ÄÂ¥Ò½ÔººËҽѧ¿Æ
Author(s):
LI Ai-mei SUN Yi-wen JIA Peng GUO Wan-hua.
Nuclear Medicine Departmentof Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital£¬Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, China
¹Ø¼ü´Ê:
¸Îϸ°ûÔ´ÐԸΰ©Öзֻ¯Õýµç×Ó·¢Éä¶Ï²ãÏÔÏñÆÏÌÑÌÇתÔ˵°°×1
Keywords:
hepatocellular carcinoma moderately differentiate PET-CT glucose transporter 1
·ÖÀàºÅ:
R735.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.06.004
ÎÄÏ×±êÖ¾Âë:
A
ÕªÒª:
Ä¿µÄ ̽ÌÖÖзֻ¯¸Îϸ°ûÔ´ÐԸΰ©Õýµç×Ó·¢Éä¶Ï²ãÏÔÏñ£¨PET-CT£©³ÉÏñÖбê×¼ÉãÈ¡Öµ£¨standardized uptake value£¬SUVmax£©ÓëÆÏÌÑÌÇתÔ˵°°×1£¨glucose transporter 1,GLUT1£©µÄ¹Øϵ¡£·½·¨ ËѼ¯2008Äê1ÔÂ-2015Äê5Ô±¾Ôº30ÀýÖзֻ¯¸Îϸ°ûÔ´ÐԸΰ©PET-CT³ÉÏñ×ÊÁϺÍÏà¹ØÁÙ´²×ÊÁÏ£¬Í¨¹ýSUVmax½øÐзÖ×飬¶Ô×éÖ¯ÇÐƬ½øÐÐGLUT1¼ì²â£¬ÀûÓÃͳ¼Æ·ÖÎöÈí¼þSPSS 19.0½øÐÐͳ¼Æѧ·ÖÎö¡£½á¹û ÒÀ¾ÝSUVmax<7ºÍSUVmax¡Ý7½«»¼Õß·ÖΪÖеÍÉãÈ¡ºÍ¸ßÉãÈ¡Á½×飬Á½×éSUVmax²îÒì¾ßÓÐͳ¼ÆѧÒâÒ壨P<0.05£©£»×éÖ¯ÇÐƬGLUT1¼ì²â½á¹ûÌáʾÖеÍÉãÈ¡×éºÍ¸ßÉãÈ¡×éGLUT1µÄ±í´ï²îÒì¾ßÓÐͳ¼ÆѧÒâÒ壨P<0.05£©£¬ÇÒSUVmaxÓëGLUT1µÄ±í´ïÁ¿´æÔÚÏà¹ØÐÔ£¨r=0.581£¬P<0.05£©¡£½áÂÛ GLUT1ÊÇÓ°ÏìÖзֻ¯¸Îϸ°ûÔ´ÐԸΰ©PET-CT³ÉÏñÖÐSUVmaxµÄÖØÒªÒòËØ¡£
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the relationship between glucose transporter protein 1 and standardized uptake value of PET-CT imaging in moderately differentiated hepatocellular cancer. Methods Collect 30 cases of moderately differentiated HCC PET-CT data and corresponding clinical data from 2008.1 to 2015.5 in our hospital. They were grouped through the standard uptake value (SUVmax ). GLUT1 was detected in tissue slice and SPSS 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results Patients were divided into low-mild intake group (SUVmax<7) and high uptake group(SUVmax¡Ý7). Two groups of SUVmax exist significant difference (P<0.05); GLUT1 of paraffin section by immunity fluorescence detection in low consuming group and high intake group also exist significant difference (P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that SUVmax was correlated with the expression of GLUT1 (r=0.581, P<0.05). Conclusion Glucose transporter protein 1 is an important factor for HCC PET-CT imaging.

²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:

[1] Hwang KH,Choi DJ, Lee SY, et al. Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas using 11C-acetate and 18F-FDG PET/CT: a preliminary study[J].Appl Radiat Isot, 2009, 67(7-8):1195-1198. [2] Kim HO, Kim JS, Shin YM, et al.Evaluation of metabolic characteristics and viability of lipiodolized hepatocellular carcinomas using 18F-FDG PET/CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2010, 51(12):1849-1856. [3] Leccisotti L, Gambacorta MA, de Waure C.The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing pathological response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2015, 42(5):657-666. [4] Cayvarl H, Beki ÿðþ ‰D R, Akman T, et al.The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer recurrence[J]. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther, 2014, 23(3):76-83. [5] Alauddin MM, De Palatis L. Current and future trends in darly detection of pancreatic cancer: molecular targets and PET probes[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2015,22(29):3370-3389. [6] Lin CY, Chen JH,Liang JA, et al.18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting extrahepatic metastases or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(9):2417-2422. [7] Kim BK, Kang WJ, Kim JK, et al.18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography as a prognostic predictor in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2011, 117(20):4779-4787. [8] À÷,¹ùÍò»ª,¼Ö Åô£¬µÈ.¸Î°©¸ÎÒÆÖ²Êõºó18F-FDG PET/CTÏÔÏñÌصãºÍÔ¤ºóÅжÏ[J].¶«ÄϹú·ÀÒ½Ò©,2010,12(5):393-396. [9] Liu TQ, Fan J, Zhou L, et al.Effects of suppressing glucose transporter-1 by an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide on the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2011, 10(1):72-77. [10] Mano Y, Aishima S, Kubo Y, et al. Correlation between biological marker expression and 18F-FDG uptake in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2014, 142(3):391-397. [11] Okazaki Y, Yamada S,Kitada S, et al. Significance of 18F-FDG PET and immunohistochemical GLUT-1 expression for cardiac myxoma[J]. Diagn Pathol, 2014, 16(9):117. [12] Watanabe Y,Suefuji H, Hirose Y, et al. 18F-FDG uptake in primary gastric malignant lymphoma correlates with glucose transporter 1 expression and histologic malignant potential[J]. Int J Hematol, 2013, 97(1):43-49. [13] Higashi T, Saga T, Nakamoto Y, et al.Relationship between retention index in dual-pHase 18F-FDG PET, and hexokinase-II and glucose transporter-1 expression in pancreatic cancer[J].J Nucl Med, 2002, 43(2):173-180. [14] Takebayashi R, Izuishi K, Yamamoto Y, et al. 18F-FDG accumulation as a biological marker of hypoxic status but not glucose transport ability in gastric cancer[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2013,32:34-34. [15] Mees G, Dierckx R, Vangestel C, et al. 18F-FDG uptake? [J]. Mol Imaging, 2013, 12(1):49-58. [16] ÀîÌìÈ»£¬À× Ó£¬ËÎ ±ó£¬µÈ.¸Î°©Ï¸°ûFDGÉãÈ¡ÓëÆÏÌÑÌÇתÔ˵°°×Ïà¹ØÐÔµÄʵÑéÑо¿[J].賦²¡Ñ§ºÍ¸Î²¡Ñ§ÔÓÖ¾,2012, 21(7):589-563.

ÏàËÆÎÄÏ×/References:

±¸×¢/Memo

±¸×¢/Memo:
¹ú¼Ò×ÔÈ»»ù½ðÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿£¨81171363£©
¸üÐÂÈÕÆÚ/Last Update: 2015-11-20