|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]赵峰,杨光,黄礼兵,等.髂筋膜腔阻滞联合喉罩在老年患者髋部骨折术中的临床应用[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(06):606-609.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.06.010]
　ZHAO Feng,YANG Guang,HUANG Li-bing,et al.The clinical application of fascia compartment nerve block combined with laryngeal mask anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing fractured femur surgery[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2018,20(06):606-609.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.06.010]
点击复制

髂筋膜腔阻滞联合喉罩在老年患者髋部骨折术中的临床应用()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
606-609
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The clinical application of fascia compartment nerve block combined with laryngeal mask anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing fractured femur surgery
作者:
赵峰; 杨光; 黄礼兵; 田伟千; 季方兵
作者单位：210029南京，南京中医药大学附属医院麻醉科（赵峰、杨光、黄礼兵、田伟千、季方兵）
Author(s):
ZHAO Feng;  YANG Guang;  HUANG Li-bing;  TIAN Wei-qian;  JI Fang-bing
（Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu，China）
关键词:
髂筋膜腔阻滞; 髋部骨折; 全身麻醉; 术后疼痛
Keywords:
fascia iliaca compartment nerve block;  femur fracture;  postoperative pain;  genenal anesthesia
分类号:
R614
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.06.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较髂筋膜腔阻滞联合喉罩和气管插管全身麻醉在老年患者髋部骨折术中的应用效果。方法 选取南京中医药大学附属医院2016年1月至2018年6月间行单侧髋部骨折防旋股骨近端髓内钉（PFNA)手术治疗的老年患者60例，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组30 例。观察组术前30 min以0.25%罗哌卡因30 mL行髂筋膜腔阻滞，术中采用喉罩全身麻醉。对照组采用常规气管插管全身麻醉。记录2组麻醉前（T1）、术前摆放体位（T2）、PFNA植入扩髓（T3）、术毕（T4）和苏醒拔管时(T5)的平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR），术中舒芬太尼总量，术后拔管时间、清醒时间，Steward苏醒评分和术后视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS) 评分，以及患者恶心、呕吐等不良反应。结果 观察组MAP与HR在T2、T3 和T5时 [（83.9±6.4）mmHg、（100.6±10.1）mmHg和（81.6±4.8）mmHg，（69.5±3.2）次/min、（78.3±3.0）次/min和（71.3±2.6）次/min]明显低于对照组[（102.0±8.0）mmHg、（110.5±13.7）mmHg和（97.2±13.5）mmHg, （84.8±2.9）次/min、（98.5±4.8）次/min和（86.0±3.2）次/min,P＜0.05]。观察组术中舒芬太尼总用量显著低于对照组[（29.2±3.6）μg vs (41.7±3.8）μg，P＜0.05]，术后清醒拔管时间显著少于对照组[（10.9±1.8）min vs （19.6±3.2）min，P＜0.05]，术后Steward苏醒评分显著高于对照组[（5.4±0.5） vs （4.9±0.5），P＜0.05]，术后VAS评分显著低于对照组[（0.7±0.6） vs （3.3±0.8），P＜0.05]。2组术后不良反应差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 髂筋膜腔阻滞联合喉罩全身麻醉可以安全有效地用于老年患者髋部骨折术，较传统气管插管全身麻醉血流动力学更为平稳、苏醒迅速和镇痛优异。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) combined laryngeal mask (LMA) anesthesia and general anesthesia with intubation in elderly patients undergoing fractured femur surgery.Methods Sixty patients undergoing proximal femornal nail antirotion (PFNA) surgery were randomized into observation group (FICB with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivocaine combined with LMA) or control group (general anesthesia with intubation). The average of arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) was measured at time points before anesthesia (T1), positioning patients (T2), enlarging the marrow cavity (T3), the end of surgery (T4) and extubation (T5). The total intravenous sulfentanyl consumption, the time of extubation and conscious recovery, Steward’s Postoperative Recovery Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were recorded. Nausea and vomiting were observed in the recovery room.Results MAP and HR in the observation group [（83.9±6.4）mmHg，（100.6±10.1）mmHg and （81.6±4.8）mmHg，（69.5±3.2）/min,（78.3±3.0）/min and （71.3±2.6）/min] at T2，T3 and T5 were significantly lower than that in the control group [（102.0±8.0）mmHg,（110.5±13.7）mmHg and （97.2±13.5）mmHg, （84.8±2.9）/min,（98.5±4.8）/min and （86.0±3.2）/min, P＜0.05]. The total intravenous sulfentanyl consumption [（29.2±3.6）μg vs (41.7±3.8）μg], the time of extubation and consciousness recovery [（10.9±1.8）min vs （19.6±3.2）min], and VAS [（0.7±0.6） vs （3.3±0.8）] in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group（P＜0.05）. Steward’s Postoperative Recovery Scale in the observation group was significantly higher than in the control group [（5.4±0.5） vs （4.9±0.5），P＜0.05]. There was no difference in nausea and vomiting between the two groups（P>0.05）.Conclusion FICB with LMA could be benefit to reduce thepain and facilitate consciousness from general anesthesia in old patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]Miller GW, Godrey JJ, Sagmeister ML,et al. Provision of fascia iliaca compartment block in the acute management of proximal femoral fractures: A national observational study of UK hospitals[J]. Injury，2016，47(11):2490-2494.
[2]Bullock WM, Yalamuri SM, Gregory SH, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Technique Provides Benefit as an Analgesic Adjunct for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. J Ultrasound Med， 2017,36(2):433-438.
[3]Sadic S, Custovic S, Jasarevuc M,et al. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: a Retrospective Study in 113 Patients[J]. Med Arch，2015，69(6):352-356.
[4]夏俊杰,金晓均,龚清，等. 68例老年髋部骨折术后并发症的防治[J].东南国防医药,2008，10(1): 10-12.
[5]沈建国, 郭亭,曾晓峰，等.温哥华B、C型股骨假体周围骨折及股骨近段骨折合并髋关节疾患的治疗策略[J].医学研究生学报, 2011，24(2): 168-171.
[6]江辉,闫韵飞,赵建宁. 3种手术方式治疗中老年股骨颈骨折疗效对比分析[J].医学研究生学报, 2012,25(7): 746-748.
[7]王桂华,周利武,郭亭，等.人工髋关节置换治疗老年陈旧性股骨粗隆间骨折的体会[J].医学研究生学报，2011,24(7): 721-724.
[8]Neuman MD, Rosenbaum PR, Ludwig JM, et al. Anesthesia technique, mortality, and length of stay after hip fracture surgery[J]. JAMA，2014，311(24):2508-2517.
[9]Johnson RL, Kopp SL, Burkle CM, et al. Neuraxialvs general anaesthesia for total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative-effectiveness research[J]. Br J Anaesth，2016，116(2):163-176.
[10]Janssen SJ, Kortlever JT, Ready JE, et al. Complications After Surgical Management of Proximal Femoral Metastasis: A Retrospective Study of 417 Patients[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg，2016，24(7):483-494.
[11]Ritcey B, Pageau P, Woo MY, et al. Regional Nerve Blocks For Hip and Femoral Neck Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review[J].CJEM，2016，18(1):37-47.
[12]Madabushi R, Rajappa GC, Thammanna PP, et al. Fascia iliaca block vs intravenous fentanyl as an analgesic technique before positioning for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for femur fractures-a randomized trial[J]. J Clin Anesth，2016，35(12):398-403.
[13]Bullock WM, Yalamuri SM, Gregory SH, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Technique Provides Benefit as an Analgesic Adjunct for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. J Ultrasound Med，2017, 36(2):433-438.
[14]Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV，et al. Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. Anesthesiol Res Pract，2015:705869. doi: 10.1155/2015/705869.
[15]Kim MH, Lee JH, Choi YS, et al. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol，2018, 35(8):598-604.

相似文献/References:

[1]夏俊杰,金晓均,龚 清,等.68例老年髋部骨折术后并发症的防治[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2008,10(01):10.
　XIA Jun-jie,JIN Xiao-jun,GONG Qing,et al.The prevention and management of postoperative complications of 68 cases with hip fracture in elders[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2008,10(06):10.
[2]王兴元,曹洪兵,范丽娟,等.肌钙蛋白对髋部骨折患者短期和长期病死率的预测作用[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2015,17(04):368.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.04.010]
　WANG Xing-yuan,CAO Hong-bing,FAN Li-juan,et al.Perioperative troponin I to predict short-term and long-term mortality in patients after hip fracture[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(06):368.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.04.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-20