|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]席云昊,卜寿山.上颌窦底冲顶提升法与CASKIT工具提升法在上颌窦底提升术并同期种植患者的应用比较[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2020,22(2):133-137.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.02.005]
　XI Yun hao,BU Shou shan.Comparison of maxillary sinus elevation and CASKIT tool elevation in application of patients with osteotome sinus floorelevation with simultaneous implantation[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2020,22(2):133-137.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.02.005]
点击复制

上颌窦底冲顶提升法与CASKIT工具提升法在上颌窦底提升术并同期种植患者的应用比较()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第22卷
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
133-137
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of maxillary sinus elevation and CASKIT tool elevation in application of patients with osteotome sinus floorelevation with simultaneous implantation
作者:
席云昊; 卜寿山
作者单位：210029南京，南京医科大学第一附属医院口腔科（席云昊、卜寿山）
Author(s):
XI Yunhao; BU Shoushan
（Department of Stomatology，the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu，China）
关键词:
上颌窦底冲顶提升法; CASKIT工具提升法; 上颌窦底提升术; 种植
Keywords:
maxillary sinus elevation;  CASKIT tool elevation;  osteotome sinus floor elevation;  implantation
分类号:
R782.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.02.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的分析上颌窦底冲顶提升法与CASKIT（crestal approachsinus kit）工具提升法在上颌窦底提升术（OSFE）并同期种植患者的应用。方法回顾性分析2016年12月至2018年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院接受OSFE并同期种植的99例患者临床资料，按OSFE术式分为3组，其中33例采用上颌窦底冲顶提升（冲顶组），35例采用CASKIT工具提升（CASKIT组），31例采用上颌窦底冲顶联合CASKIT工具提升（联合组）。比较3组种植系统、种植体数、愈合方式、术前后骨高度及提升幅度、种植失败及并发症发生率。结果99例患者共计植入134枚种植体，其中40例植入53枚Osstem种植体，47例植入63枚Dentium种植体，12例植入18枚NobelGuide种植体，3组植骨数量、种植系统、种植体数比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；冲顶组、CASKIT组、联合组中潜入式缝合例数分别为22例（66.67%）、20例（57.14%）、22例（70.97%），其余为非潜入式缝合，3组愈合方式比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；3组术后骨高度较术前均显著提升，CASKIT组、联合组术后骨高度及提升幅度均显著高于冲顶组（P＜0.05），但CASKIT组与联合组术后骨高度及提升幅度比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；联合组未见种植失败及并发症发生，冲顶组种植失败位点数、术中穿孔、术后上颌窦炎及耳石症发生率分别为4.54%、9.09%、2.27%、2.27%，CASKIT组为6.25%、6.25%、2.08%、2.08%，但3组种植失败及并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论较颌窦底冲顶提升法，CASKIT工具提升法或两种提升方式联合应用在提升骨高度上优势更显著，但联合应用具有更高的种植成功比例及更低的并发症风险，值得临床重视。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the application of maxillary sinus elevation and CASKIT (crestal approachsinus kit) tool elevation in patients with osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) with simultaneous implantation.MethodsA total of 99 patients who underwent OSFE and simultaneous implantation in the hospital from December 2016 to December 2018 were grouped according to OSFE methods. Thirtythree patients underwent maxillary sinus elevation, and 35 patients underwent CASKIT tool elevation, and 31 patients underwent maxillary sinus elevation combined with CASKIT tool elevation.They were corresponding to floor group, CASKIT group and combined group. The implantation system, number of implants, healing methods, bone height and elevation degree before and after surgery and incidence rates of implantation failures and complications were compared among three groups.ResultsA total of 134 implants were implanted in 99 patients, and among them, 40 cases were implanted with 53 Osstem implants, 47 cases with 63 Dentium implants and 12 cases with 18 NobelGuide implants.There were no significant differences in the number of bone grafting, implantation system and number of implants among three groups (P>0.05). The number of cases of submerged sutures in floor group, CASKIT group and combined group were 22 (66.67%) cases, 20 (57.14%) cases and 22 (70.97%) cases respectively.The rest were nonsubmerged sutures, and the difference of three groups of healing methods was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The bone height of three groups after surgery was significantly improved compared with before surgery, and the bone height and elevation degree in CASKIT group and combined group after surgery were significantly higher than those in floor group (P<0.05).But there were no significant differences in the bone height and elevation degree after surgery between CASKIT group and combined group (P>0.05). Failure and complications did not occur in combined group, and the incidence rates of failure sites, intraoperative perforation, postoperative maxillary sinusitis and otolithic disease were 4.54%, 9.09%, 2.27% and 2.27% respectively in floor group, and 6.25%, 6.25%, 2.08% and 2.08% in CASKIT group.But there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of implantation failures and complications among the three groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with maxillary sinus elevation, CASKIT tool elevation or the combination of two elevation methods has a more significant advantage in improving bone height.But the combined application has a higher proportion of successful implantation and lower risk of complications. It is worthy of clinical attention.

参考文献/References:

[1]BrignardelloPetersen R.. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone graft seems to result in high survival rates and small amount of bone loss after 10 years[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2018, 149(1):e27e33.
[2]邹长萍, 何家才.上颌窦底外提升同期种植体植入术在修复上颌后牙区严重骨量不足中的应用[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2016, 29(12):12951299.
[3]沈洪洲, 马猛, 黄圣运, 等. 植骨和不植骨上颌窦提升术后种植体周围骨组织应力分布的三维有限元分析[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(45):8586.
[4]Molinos J, Manrique C, Trapote S, et al. Survival/success rate of implants placed with crestal approach sinus lift in patients with 4mm of RBH[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(S14):3030.
[5]Fornell J, Johansson L , Bolin A, et al. Flapless, CBCTguided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1year followup[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 23(1):2834.
[6]Kanayama T，Horii K，Senga Y , et al. Crestal Approach to Sinus Floor Elevation for Atrophic Maxilla Using PlateletRich Fibrin as the Only Grafting Material: A 1Year Prospective Study[J]. Implant Dent, 2015, 25(1):3238.
[7]Lopez MA,Andreasi BM, Confalone L, et al. Maxillary sinus floor elevation via crestal approach: the evolution of the hydraulic pressure technique[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(2):12732.
[8]王仁飞, 赵丹, 林海燕, 等. 两种经牙槽嵴顶入路的上颌窦底提升术同期种植的临床对照观察[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018, 53(12):821825.
[9]陈安勇, 周尚敏, 杨小东,等. CASKIT联合上颌窦冲顶在上颌窦底内提升中的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2017, 22(2):6063.
[10]Qin L, Lin S, Guo Z, et al. Influences of Schneiderian membrane conditions on the early outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: a prospective cohort study in the healingperiod[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(9):10741081.
[11]Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Cusimano P, et al. Bone Scrapers Versus Piezoelectric Surgery in the Lateral Antrostomy for Sinus Floor Elevation[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2017, 28(5):11911196.
[12]周宏志, 周静, 陈小冬, 等. CBCT+Invivo5软件介导上颌窦提升的临床疗效评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2014,30(5):421424.
[13]DaneshSani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 54(7):724730.
[14]Lundgren S，Cricchio G，Hallman M, et al. Sinus floor elevation procedures to enable implant placement and integration: techniques, biological aspects and clinical outcomes[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 73(1):103120.
[15]Stacchi C，Sentineri R，Berton F, et al. Conjunctival chemosis: an uncommon complication after transcrestal lifting of the sinus floor[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 54(9):10521054.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：江苏省卫生计生委科研项目（H201642）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-11