|±¾ÆÚĿ¼/Table of Contents|

[1]Íõ¬b,ÐíÀö·ï,Öܱù.51Àý¹¦ÄÜÐÔò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡»¼ÕßµÄÓ°Ïñѧ¹Û²ìÓë·ÖÎö[J].ҽѧÑо¿ÓëÕ½´´É˾ÈÖÎ(ԭҽѧÑо¿Éúѧ±¨),2022,24(1):27-31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.01.006]
¡¡WANG Cheng,XU Li-feng,ZHOU Bing.Imaging observation and analysis of 51 patients with temporomandibular joint disorder[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH ¡ªCOMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2022,24(1):27-31.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.01.006]
µã»÷¸´ÖÆ

51Àý¹¦ÄÜÐÔò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡»¼ÕßµÄÓ°Ïñѧ¹Û²ìÓë·ÖÎö()

¡¶Ò½Ñ§Ñо¿ÓëÕ½´´É˾ÈÖΡ·£¨Ô­Ò½Ñ§Ñо¿Éúѧ±¨£©[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

¾í:
µÚ24¾í
ÆÚÊý:
2022Äê1ÆÚ
Ò³Âë:
27-31
À¸Ä¿:
ÁÙ´²Ñо¿
³ö°æÈÕÆÚ:
2022-02-20

ÎÄÕÂÐÅÏ¢/Info

Title:
Imaging observation and analysis of 51 patients with temporomandibular joint disorder
×÷Õß:
Íõ¬bÐíÀö·ïÖܱù
×÷Õßµ¥Î»£º350025¸£ÖÝ,½â·Å¾üÁªÇÚ±£Õϲ¿¶ÓµÚ¾Å¡ð¡ðÒ½Ôº¿ÚÇ»¿Æ(Íõ¬b¡¢Öܱù)£¬Ó°Ïñ¿Æ£¨ÐíÀö·ï£©
Author(s):
WANG ChengXU Li-fengZHOU Bing
(1.Department of Stomatology, 2.Department of Imaging, the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force£¬PLA£¬Fuzhou 350025, Fujian, China)
¹Ø¼ü´Ê:
ò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡ò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½Ú½á¹¹ÄÚÎÉÂÒ׶ÐÎÊøCTºË´Å¹²Õñ³ÉÏñ
Keywords:
temporomandibular joint disorder temporomandibular joint intend derangement cone beam Ct magnetic resonance imaging
·ÖÀàºÅ:
R782.63
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.01.006
ÎÄÏ×±êÖ¾Âë:
A
ÕªÒª:
Ä¿µÄÀûÓÃ׶ÐÎÊøCT£¨CBCT£©ÓëºË´Å¹²Õñ³ÉÏñ£¨MRI£©¼¼Êõ¹Û²ìÓë·ÖÎöò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡£¨TMD£©»¼ÕßµÄò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÅÌÍ»½á¹¹¸Ä±äÓëÆäÁÙ´²Ö¢×´¼äµÄ¹Øϵ£¬ÎªTMD»¼ÕßµÄÁÙ´²Õï¶ÏºÍÖÎÁÆÌṩ²Î¿¼¡£·½·¨ÊÕ¼¯2021Äê1ÔÂÖÁ4ÔÂÔÚ½â·Å¾üÁªÇÚ±£Õϲ¿¶ÓµÚ¾Å¡ð¡ðÒ½Ôº¿ÚÇ»¿Æ¾ÍÕïµÄTMD»¼Õß56Àý£¬·ÖΪµ¥Ò»Ö¢×´×飨ÌÛÍ´¡¢µ¯Ïì¡¢ÏÂò¢¹¦ÄÜÕÏ°­£©12Àý¡¢¸´ºÏÖ¢×´×飨ÌÛÍ´+µ¯Ïì¡¢ÌÛÍ´+ÏÂò¢¹¦ÄÜÕÏ°­¡¢µ¯Ïì+ÏÂò¢¹¦ÄÜÕÏ°­¡¢ÌÛÍ´+µ¯Ïì+ÏÂò¢¹¦ÄÜÕÏ°­£©39Àý£»Õý³£¶ÔÕÕ×é5ÀýΪÎÞTMDÁÙ´²Ö¢×´ÒòÆäËû¿ÚÇ»ÖÎÁƶø¾ÍÕïµÄ»¼Õß¡£ËùÓÐÊÜÊÔÕß¾­CBCTºÍMRI¼ì²éºó£¬²âÁ¿ËùÓÐÊÜÊÔÕß×óÓÒ²àò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½Ú¼ä϶¡¢¹Ø½ÚÅÌÖдø¾àÀëºÍ¹Ø½ÚÅ̺ó´ø½Ç¶È£¬·ÖÎö3×éÊÜÊÔÕßµÄ÷Á״ͻλÖᢹؽÚÅÌλÖõIJîÒì¡£½á¹û56ÀýÊÜÊÔÕß×ÔÉí×óÓÒ²à¹Ø½Ú¼ä϶ָÊý¡¢¹Ø½ÚÅÌÖдø¾àÀëºÍºó´ø½Ç¶È¼ä²îÒìÎÞͳ¼ÆѧÒâÒ壨P>0.05£©£»3×éÊÜÊÔÕß¼ä϶ָÊýÓë¹Ø½ÚÅÌλÖòîÒì¾ùÓÐͳ¼ÆѧÒâÒ壨P¾ù<0.01£©£»×é¼ä¶àÖرȽÏÏÔʾ£¬¸´ºÏÖ¢×´×é¼ä϶ָÊý£¨-6.090¡À22.659£©Îª3×éÖÐ×îµÍ£¬¹Ø½ÚÅÌÖдø¾àÀë[(4.519¡À3.505)mm]¡¢¹Ø½ÚÅ̺ó´ø½Ç¶È[(46.330¡À34.277) ¡ã]Ϊ3×éÖÐ×î¸ß£»½¡¿µ¶ÔÕÕ×é¼ä϶ָÊý£¨20.200¡À21.831£©Îª3×éÖÐ×î¸ß£¬¹Ø½ÚÅÌÖдø¾àÀë[(1.400¡À1.265)mm]¡¢¹Ø½ÚÅ̺ó´ø½Ç¶È[(15.900¡À19.017) ¡ã]Ϊ3×éÖÐ×îµÍ¡£¸´ºÏÖ¢×´×é¼ä϶ָÊý¡¢¹Ø½ÚÅÌÖдø¾àÀëºÍ¹Ø½ÚÅ̺ó´ø½Ç¶ÈÓëµ¥Ò»Ö¢×´×é¡¢½¡¿µ¶ÔÕÕ×é±È½Ï²îÒì¾ùÓÐͳ¼ÆѧÒâÒ壨P<0.05£©¡£½áÂÛò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÄÚ²¿½á¹¹ÎÉÂÒ£¨TMJID£©ÓëÁÙ´²Ö¢×´Óйأ¬CBCT½áºÏMRIÓ°Ïñѧ¼ì²é¿ÉÒÔ½ÏÇåÎú׼ȷÅжÏTMD»¼Õßò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½Ú½á¹¹ÎÉÂҳ̶ȣ¬ÊÇÁÙ´²TMD»¼ÕßÖØÒªµÄÕïÁƼ¼ÊõÊֶΡ£
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze relationship between Internal structure of the TMJ changes and clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint by cone-beam CT and MRI in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), so as to provide reference information for clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients with TMD.Methods56 patients with TMD admitted to the Department of Stomatology in the 900th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force were collected from Jan to Apr 2021. The patients were divided into three groups: 12 cases of TMD in the single symptom group (pain, licks, Mandibular dysfunction), 39 cases of TMD in the complex symptoms group £¨pain+click, pain+Mandibular dysfunction, click+Mandibular dysfunction, pain+click+Mandibular dysfunction£©£¬Five healthy volunteers without clinical symptoms of TMD in the control group. After CBCT and MRI examination, the left and right temporomandibular joint space and articular disc positions of all patients were measured according to the G¢‰kalp H¡¯S. The condylar position and articular disc position of the 3 groups were analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in left and right joint space index and articular disc position among 56 patients £¨P>0.05£©. There was statistical significance in the measurement index of the joint space and the position of the articular disc in each term£¨P<0.01£©. Multiple comparisons between groups showed that the joint space index in the complex symptoms group was £¨-6.090¡À22.659£©, which was the lowest among the three groups. The median disc distance was [(4.519¡À3.505) mm]. The angle of posterior disc in the complex symptoms group was [(46.330¡À34.277) ¡ã], which were the highest among the three groups. The joint space index of the healthy control group was £¨20.200¡À21.831£©, which was the highest among the three groups. The median disc distance was [(1.400¡À1.265) mm]. The angle of posterior disc in the healthy control group was [(15.900¡À19.017) ¡ã], which were the lowest among the three groups. Compared with the single symptom group and the healthy control group, there were significant differences in the joint space index, the median disc distance and the angle of posterior disc in the complex symptoms group (P<0.05).ConclusionTemporomandibular Joint Intend Derangement (TMJID) is correlated with clinical symptoms. CBCT combined with MR imaging examination can clearly and accurately determine the degree of TMD structure disorder in patients with TMD, which is an important diagnostic and treatment technique for clinical TMD patients.

²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:

[1]ÍõÃÀÇà.ºÏѧ[M].±±¾©£ºÈËÃñÎÀÉú³ö°æÉ磬2020£º37£¬168-169.
[2]Yang Z, Wang M, Ma Y,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Evaluation for Anterior Disc Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23: 712-718.
[3]G¢‰kalp H. Disc position in clinically asymptomatic, pretreatment adolescents with Class I, II, or III malocclusion: A retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study[J].J Orofac Orthop,2016,77(3):194-202.
[4]Drace JE, Enzmann DR.Defining the normal temporomandibular joint: closed-, partially open-, and open-mouth MR imaging of asymptomatic subjects[J].Radiology,1990,177(1):67-71.
[5]G¢‰kalp H, T¨¹rkkahraman H. Changes in position of the temporomandibular joint disc and condyle after disc repositioning appliance therapy: a functional examination and magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Angle Orthod,2000,70(5):400-408.
[6]ÂíÐ÷³¼.¶Ôò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡¹Ø½ÚÅÌÒÆλµÄÈÏʶ¼°ÖÎÁƲßÂÔ[J].Öлª¿ÚǻҽѧÔÓÖ¾£¬2017£¬52£¨3£©£º139-142.
[7]Incesu L, Ta ÿðþ ‰D kaya-Yilmaz N, Og¡§¨¹tcen-Toller M,et al.Relationship of condylar position to disc position and morphology[J].Eur J Radiol,2004,51(3):269-273.
[8]Kurita H, Ohtsuka A, Kobayashi H,et al.A study of the relationship between the position of the condylar head and displacement of the Temporomandibular joint disk[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2001,30(3):162-165.
[9]Ikeda K, Kawamura A.Disc displacement and changes in condylar position[J].Dentomaxillofac Radiol,2013,42(3)£º84227642. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/84227642.
[10]Paknahad M, Shahidi S.Association between mandibular condylar position and clinical dysfunction index[J].J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2015,43(4):432-436.
[11]º«°ï·æ£¬ÂÞÙ»æã¬ÕÅÓ±£¬µÈ. 528Àý¶ùͯò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡µÄ»Ø¹ËÐÔÑо¿[J].¿ÚÇ»ò¢ÃæÐÞ¸´Ñ§ÔÓÖ¾,2021,22£¨1£©£º33-37.
[12]ÕÅ¿¡³¬£¬ÁõÒ»Åô£¬½¹Á¬Áú£¬µÈ. ò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½Ú¼ä϶¸Ä±äÓë¹Ø½ÚÅÌÒÆλ¹ØϵµÄÑо¿[J].°²»ÕÒ½¿Æ´óѧѧ±¨,2016,51£¨10£©:1552-1554.
[13]Robinson de Senna B, Marques LS, Fran¢“a JP£¬et al.Condyle-disk-fossa position and relationship to clinical signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in women[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009,108(3):e117-124.
[14]ÍõÃÀÇå.ò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÅÌÒÆλÓë¹Ø½Ú×éÖ¯¸Ä½¨[J].Öлª¿ÚǻҽѧÔÓÖ¾£¬2017£¬52£¨3£©£º143-147.
[15]ÕÔ¶þ¾ü£¬ÕŶ«Ãã¬ÂíÓÀƽ£¬µÈ.TMDµ¥²àò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÌÛÍ´»¼ÕßË«²à¹Ø½ÚMRI±È½ÏÑо¿[J].ºÓ±±Ò½Ò©£¬2018£¬40£¨2£©:239-242.
[16]Ta ÿðþ ‰D kaya-Yy£§lmaz N, Og¡§¨¹tcen-Toller M.Clinical correlation of MRI Findings of internal derangements of the Temoromandibular Joints[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,40(3):317-321.
[17]Hosgor H. The relationship between temporomandibular joint effusion and pain in patients with internal derangement[J].J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2019,47(6):940-944.
[18]Ribeiro RF, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW,et al.The prevalence of disc displacement in symptomatic and asymptomatic volunteers aged 6 to 25 years[J].J Orofac Pain,1997,11(1):37-47.
[19]±ÏÎľ꣬Íõ¶«£¬ÕÅÎÄìÏ£¬µÈ.ÎÞÖ¢×´ÇàÄêò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÅÌλÖõÄMRIÑо¿[J].¿Úǻҽѧ,2011£¬31£¨5£©:282-284.
[20]Song J, Cheng M, Qian Y£¬et al. Conebeam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle¡¯s classification[J]. Oral Radiol, 2020,36£¨3£©:261-266.
[21]ÌÆÙ»£¬·½Ö¾ÐÀ£¬ÖÜæÌ£¬µÈ.MRIÆÀ¼Û°²ÊÏ¢ñÀàºÍ¢òÀà³ÉÄêÄÐÐÔÏÂò¢Öð²½Ç°ÉìÖÐò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÅ̵Ä×éÖ¯½á¹¹±ä»¯[J].Öйú×éÖ¯¹¤³ÌÑо¿,2018,22(12):1811-1816.
[22] ³ÂÖ¾êÊ£¬ºúÃô.ò¨ÏÂò¢¹Ø½ÚÎÉÂÒ²¡µÄMRIÆÀ¹À[J].Öлª¿ÚǻҽѧÔÓÖ¾£¬2020,55£¨2£©:139-144.

ÏàËÆÎÄÏ×/References:

±¸×¢/Memo

±¸×¢/Memo:
-
¸üÐÂÈÕÆÚ/Last Update: 2022-02-21