|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]靳永胜,东冰,贾军琪,等.不同术式治疗大体积前列腺增生疗效分析及术后尿道狭窄相关因素对比[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2022,24(1):45-49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.01.010]
　JIN Yong-sheng,DONG Bing,JIA Jun-qi,et al.Analysis of the curative effect of three surgical methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia and postoperative urethral stricture comparative study of related factors[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2022,24(1):45-49.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.01.010]
点击复制

不同术式治疗大体积前列腺增生疗效分析及术后尿道狭窄相关因素对比()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2022年1期
页码:
45-49
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the curative effect of three surgical methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia and postoperative urethral stricture comparative study of related factors
作者:
靳永胜; 东冰; 贾军琪; 宋红雄; 张斌斌; 高继学; 李义; 杨小龙
作者单位：716000延安，延安大学附属医院泌尿外科（靳永胜、贾军琪、宋红雄、张斌斌、高继学、李义），感染病科（东冰），生殖医学中心（杨小龙）
Author(s):
JIN Yong-sheng; DONG Bing; JIA Jun-qi; SONG Hong-xiong; ZHANG Bin-bin; GAO Ji-xue; LI Yi; YANG Xiao-long
(1. Department of Urology, 2. Department of Infection, 3. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, Shaanxi，China)
关键词:
三种经尿道手术; 大体积前列腺增生; 疗效分析; 尿道狭窄; 相关因素
Keywords:
three types of transurethral surgery; large benign prostatic hyperplasia; efficacy analysis; urethral stricture; relevant factors
分类号:
R699.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.01.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)、前列腺等离子剜切术(PKERP)和钬激光剜除术(HoLEP) 治疗大体积(体积≥80 mL)前列腺增生（BPH）效果及术后尿道狭窄发生情况。方法回顾性分析从2015年2月至2018年2月间在延安大学附属医院泌尿外科行经尿道手术治疗的380例大体积BPH(体积≥80 mL)患者临床资料，根据不同术式分为TURP组（n=148）、PKERP组（n=122）与HoLEP组（n=110），分别行TURP、PKERP术和HoLEP术。比较3组围手术期相关指标、术后半年相关随访指标，并对各组尿道狭窄发生情况和相关危险因素进行统计分析。结果TURP组、PKERP组与HoLEP组手术时间分别为（130.4±12. 8）min、（105.5±15. 8）min、（100.3±9. 8）min；术中出血量分别为（204.3±23.4）mL、（96.3±15.4）mL、（65.8±11.1）mL；切除前列腺重量分别为（65.3±8.6）g、（83.6±15.3）g、（85.4±11.6）g；血红蛋白（Hb）下降值分别为（22.7±11.5）g/L、（14.3±10.2）g/L、（6.4±5.6）g/L；术后留置尿管时间分别为（5.2±0.5）d、（3.1±1.3）d、（2.5±1.2）d；住院时间分别为（10.5±1.5）d、（7.2±1.7）d、（4.8±0.6）d。以上指标组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，PKERP组与HoLEP组在手术时间、切除前列腺重量、术后留置尿管时间方面差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。术后半年TURP组、PKERP组与HoLEP组生活质量评分（QOL）分别为(4.3±0.5)分、(2.8±0.7)分、(2.6±0.9)分；国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)分别为(11.5±2.5)分、(8.6±1.8)分、(7.3±1.9)分；最大尿流率（Qmax）分别为(13.3±3.5)mL/s、(16.8±2.1)mL/s、(17.5±3.6)mL/s；各组指标术前术后比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，TURP组术后指标改善情况较其他2组差(P＜0.05)，PKERP组与HoLEP组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。术后半年3组患者尿中白细胞数分别为(20.3±10.5) 个/μL、(10.8±8.4) 个/μL、(8.6±7.4) 个/μL，尿道狭窄率分别为8.8%（13/148）、3.3%（4/122）、2.7%（3/110），TURP组较其他2组在尿路感染和尿道狭窄发生率方面显著增高(P＜0.05)， PKERP组与HoLEP组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。3组手术前后前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。logistic回归分析显示尿道狭窄与手术方式（P=0.025）、尿管时留置间（P=0.028）、失血量（P=0.013）、术后尿白细胞数（P=0.031）显著相关。结论在治疗大体积BPH时，PKERP与HoLEP较TURP术优势明显，HoLEP具有出血更少、住院时间更短等优点，PKERP更易于推广；TURP术后尿道狭窄率较PKERP与HoLEP高，主要因素为增生组织切除不彻底、术后留置尿管时间长、失血量相对较多、存在感染等因素。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKERP), and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of large (prostate volume ≥80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and the occurrence of urethral strictures happening.MethodsThe clinical data of 380 patients with large volume BPH who underwent transurethral surgery from February 2015 to February 2018 in our department were retrospectively analyzed and divided into TURP group (n=148), PKERP group (n=122) and HoLEP group (n=110), performed TURP, PKERP and HoLEP, respectively. The perioperative indicators and the follow-up indicators of the six months after operation were compared among the three groups, and the incidence of urethral strictures and related risk factors in each group were statistically analyzed.ResultsThe operation time of TURP group, PKERP group and HoLEP group were (130.4±12.8) min, (105.5±15.8) min, (100.3±9.8) min. The intraoperative blood losses were (204.3±23.4) mL, (96.3±15.4) mL, (65.8±11.1) mL. The amounts of adenectomy were (65.3±8.6) g, (83.6±15.3) g, (85.4±11.6) g. The intraoperative hemoglobin levels (Hb) were respectively (22.7±11.5) g/L, (14.3±10.2) g/L, (6.4±5.6) g/L. The catheter-indwelling times were (5.2±0.5) d, (3.1±1.3) d, (2.5±1.2) d. The hospital stays were (10.5±1.5) d, (7.2±1.7) d, and (4.8±0.6) d. The differences between the above index groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time, amount of adenectomy, and catheter-indwelling time between the PKERP group and the HoLEP group (P>0.05). Six months postoperative, the quality of life (QOL) of the TURP group, PKERP group and HoLEP group were (4.3±0.5) points, (2.8±0.7) points, (2.6±0.9) points. And IPSS scores were (11.5±2.5) points, (8.6±1.8) points, (7.3±1.9) points. The maximum urinary flow rates (Qmax) were (13.3±3.5) mL/s, (16.8±2.1) mL/s, (17.5±3.6) mL/s. The comparison of the indexes before and after surgery in each group was statistically significant (P<0.05). The improvement of the postoperative indicators in the TURP group was worse than that in the other two groups (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the PKERP group and the HoLEP group (P>0.05). Urinary leukocyte counts at half a year after surgery of the three groups of patients were (20.3±10.5)/μL, (10.8±8.4)/μL, and (8.6±7.4)/μL. The urethral stricture rates were 8.8% (13/148), 3.3% (4/122), 2.7% (3/110). The incidence of urinary tract infection and urethral stricture were significantly higher in the TURP group than in the other two groups (P <0.05). PKERP group compared with HoLEP group, there was no significant statistical significance (P>0.05). There were no significant differences of PSA between the three groups before and after surgery. Logistic regression analysis showed that urethral stricture was significantly related to operation method（P=0.025）, catheter-indwelling time（P=0.028）, blood loss（P=0.013）, and urinary leukocyte count at half a year after surgery（P=0.031）.ConclusionIn the treatment of large-volume BPH, PKERP and HoLEP have obvious advantages over TURP. HoLEP has the advantages of less bleeding and shorter hospital stay. However, the learning curve is longer and PKERP is more suitable for promotion in primary hospitals. The rate of urethral stricture after TURP is higher than that of PKERP and HOLEP. The main factors are incomplete resection of hyperplastic tissue, long time of indwelling urethral catheter, high blood loss and infection.

参考文献/References:

[1]Kan CF,Tsu HL,Chiu Y, et al. A prospective study comparing bipolar endoscopic enucleation of prostate with bipolar transurethral resection in saline for management of symptomatic benign prostate enlargement larger than 70 g in a matched cohort[J].Int Urol Nephrol, 2013, 46(3):511-517.
[2]Welliver C,Helo S,McVary KT.Technique considerations and complication management in transurethral resection of the prostate and photoselective vaporization of the prostate[J].Transl Androl Urol,2017,6(4): 695-703.
[3]Palaniappan S, Kuo TL, Cheng CW,et al. Early outcome of transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate[J]. Singapore Med J,2016,57（12）:676-680.
[4]van Ｒij S,Gilling PJ.In 2013,Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) may be the new’ gold standard’[J].Curr Urol Rep,2012,13(6): 427-432.
[5]那彦群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册[M].北京: 人民卫生出版社，2014:245-265.
[6]Leyh H，Necknig U.Transurethral prostatectomy: Management of complications[J].Urologe A,2014,53(5): 699-705.
[7]Cornu JN,Ahyai S,Bachmann A,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: An update[J]. Eur Urol,2015,67(6): 1066-1096.
[8]Wang L,Yu QY,Liu Y,et al.Efficacy and safety of laser surgery and transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia: A network meta-analysis[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2016,17(9): 4281-4288.
[9]Tao H,Jiang YY,Jun Q,et al.Analysis of risk factors leading to postoperative urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture following transurethral resection of prostate[J].Int Braz J Urol,2016,42(2): 302-311.
[10]王建文,张孟冬,平浩,等.前列腺等离子剜切术和钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2018,24(12):1084-1088.
[11]米军,汪林军.大体积良性前列腺增生: 选择何种术式?[J]中华男科学杂志,2019,25(5):387-391.
[12]王文祥，李雷，李海，等.两种术式治疗较大体积良性前列腺增生的临床比较[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2019,8(3):200-203.
[13]张伟，陈其超，冯欢，等.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效比较[J].东南国防医药，2019，21（6）：649-651.
[14]周宁，黄广林，李贵忠，等.口腔黏膜尿道成形术治疗经尿道前列腺电切术后前尿道狭窄疗效观察[J].中国临床医生杂志，2018，46（3）:338-339.
[15]Heyns CF,Van der MJ,Basson J,et al.Treatment of male urethral strictures-possible reasons for the use of repeated dilatation or internal urethrotomy rather than urethroplasty[J].S Afr J Surg,2012,50(3): 82-87.
[16]Doluoglu OG,Gokkaya CS,Aktas BK,et al.Impact of asymptomatic prostatitis on re-operations due to urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture developed after TURP[J].Int Urol Nephrol，2012，44(4): 1085-1090.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-21