|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘月娥,张宇豪,刘锐,等.经鼻高流量序贯治疗对脓毒症机械通气患者的预后影响[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2022,24(4):341-344.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.04.002]
 LIU Yue-e,ZHANG Yu-hao,LIU Rui,et al.Effect of high-flow nasal oxygen cannula therapy on the prognosis of patients with mechanical ventilation of sepsis[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2022,24(4):341-344.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.04.002]
点击复制

经鼻高流量序贯治疗对脓毒症机械通气患者的预后影响()

《医学研究与战创伤救治》(原医学研究生学报)[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2022年4期
页码:
341-344
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of high-flow nasal oxygen cannula therapy on the prognosis of patients with mechanical ventilation of sepsis
作者:
刘月娥张宇豪刘锐王蒙蒙张炜杨志洲
作者单位:210002南京,南京医科大学金陵临床医学院(东部战区总医院)急诊医学科(刘月娥、张宇豪、刘锐、王蒙蒙、张炜、杨志洲)
Author(s):
LIU Yue-eZHANG Yu-haoLIU RuiWANG Meng-mengZHANG WeiYANG Zhi-zhou
(Department of Emergency Medicine,Jinling Hospital,Nanjing Medical University/General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, PLA, Nanjing 210002,Jiangsu,China)
关键词:
脓毒症经鼻高流量无创通气机械通气
Keywords:
sepsisnasal high flownoninvasive ventilationmechanical ventilation
分类号:
R459.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.04.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨经鼻高流量序贯治疗在脓毒症机械通气患者中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析2019年6月-2021年12月东部战区总医院急诊重症监护室收治的脓毒症机械通气患者78例的临床资料,据患者脱机后序贯治疗方式将患者分为经鼻高流量吸氧(HFNC)组(n=36)和无创辅助通气(NIV)组(n=42),分别统计分析2组患者基线资料以及72 h内再插管率、ICU内再插管率、ICU内死亡率、28 d死亡率、ICU住院时间情况和总住院时间,并分析比较2组患者ICU内再插管的原因。结果HFNC组与NIV组患者的再插管率、死亡率、住院时间比较差异统计学均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Kaplan-Meier法分析显示2组患者拔管后的累积再插管的可能性差异无统计学意义(log-rank P=0.770)。2组患者再插管病因最常见的为低氧血症,NIV组和HFNC组分别为58.33%和54.55%,NIV组的咳痰障碍发生率高于HFNC组(25.00% vs 18.18%,P<0.05)。NIV组患者不良耐受发生明显高于HFNC组(0 vs 19.05%,P<0.05)。结论对于脓毒症机械通气患者,与NIV相比,HFNC序贯脱机治疗不增加患者再插管率及其他不良预后发生,且具有较好的耐受性。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of high-flow nasal oxygen cannula(HFNC) therapy in patients with mechanical ventilation of sepsis.MethodsA total of 78 patients with mechanical ventilation of sepsis admitted to the emergency intensive care unit of our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into HFNC group (n=36) and None invasive Ventilation (NIV) group (n=42) according to sequential therapy after weaning. The baseline data, reintubation rate within 72 h, ICU reintubation rate, ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, length of stay in ICU and total length of hospital stay of patients in the two groups were statistically analyzed, and the causes of reintubation of the patients in the two groups were analyzed and compared.ResultsThere were no significant differences in reintubation rate, mortality rate and length of hospital stay between HFNC group and NIV group (P>0.05). Kaplan-meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the cumulative possibility of intubation after extubation between the two groups (log-rank P=0.770). The most common cause of reintubation in the two groups was hypoxemia, 58.33% of NIV and 54.55% of HFNC, respectively. The incidence of expectoration disorder in NIV group was higher than that in HFNC group (25.00% vs 18.18%,P<0.05). The incidence of intolerance in NIV group was significantly higher than that in HFNC group (0 vs 19.05%, P<0.05).ConclusionCompared with NIV, sequential weaning with HFNC does not increase the rate of reintubation and other adverse outcomes in patients with mechanical ventilation of sepsis, and is well tolerated.

参考文献/References:

[1]Moore S, Weiss B, Pascual JL, et al. Management of Acute Respiratory Failure in the Patient with Sepsis or Septic Shock[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt),2018,19(2):191-201.
[2]Drescher GS, Al-Ahmad MM. Analysis of Noninvasive Ventilation in Subjects With Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure[J]. Respir Care,2021,66(7):1063-1073.
[3]Ni YN, Luo J, Yu H, et al. Can high-flow nasal cannula reduce the rate of reintubation in adult patients after extubation? A meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pulm Med,2017,17(1):142.
[4]Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016[J]. Intensive Care Med,2017,43(3):304-377.
[5]Ladeira MT, Vital FM, Andriolo RB, et al. Pressure support versus T-tube for weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014,2014(5):CD006056.
[6]申前进, 阳文新, 吴飞, 等. 早期无创通气在抢救急性左心衰竭合并呼吸衰竭患者中的临床应用[J]. 东南国防医药, 2017,19(1):34-36.
[7]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al.The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810.
[8]Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs ofcare[J]. Crit Care Med,2001,29(7):1303-1310.
[9]Teixeira C, Frederico Tonietto T, Cadaval Gonalves S, et al. Noradrenaline use is not associated with extubation failure in septic patients[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care,2008,36(3):385-390.
[10]Matsuda W. Strategies to Avoid Extubation Failure Among ICU Patients[J]. JAMA,2020,323(9):891-892.
[11]Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, et al. Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined withHFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study[J]. Crit Care,2020,24(1):28.
[12]Frat JP, Brugiere B, Ragot S, et al. Sequential application of oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot study[J].Respir Care,2015,60(2):170-178.
[13]Hernández G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized ClinicalTrial[J]. JAMA, 2016,316(15):1565-1574.
[14]薛翔, 贾凌, 杨敬辉,等. 经鼻高流量氧疗与无创通气治疗急性左心衰竭的效果比较[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2020, 15(1):42-45.
[15]Thille AW, Muller G, Gacouin A, et al. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Oxygen With Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Alone on Reintubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA,2019,322(15):1465-1475.
[16]Yoo JW, Synn A, Huh JW, et al. Clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula compared to noninvasive ventilation in patients with post-extubation respiratory failure[J]. Korean J Intern Med,2016,31(1):82-88.
[17]Nishimura M. High-flow nasal cannula is superior to noninvasive ventilation to prevent reintubation?[J] Ann Transl Med,2017,5(5):107.
[18]Zhao H, Wang H, Sun F, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care,2017,21(1):184.
[19]Nishimura M. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Adults: Physiological Benefits, Indication, Clinical Benefits, and Adverse Effects[J]. Respir Care,2016,61(4):529-541.
[20]李亮, 曹昌魁, 聂时南. 小剂量氢化可的松治疗严重脓毒症患者的疗效观察[J]. 东南国防医药, 2016,18(5):455-457.
[21]Rosenberg K. Lower Reintubation Risk with Noninvasive Ventilation Plus High-Flow Nasal Oxygen[J]. Am J Nurs,2020,120(2):50.
[22]Thille AW, Monseau G, Coudroy R, et al. Non-invasive ventilation versus high-flow nasal oxygen for postextubation respiratory failure in ICU: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Crit Care,2021,25(1):221.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 丽,侯毅翰,张民伟,等.降钙素原在血流感染中的临床应用分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2013,15(06):603.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.06.016]
 ZHANG Li,HOU Yi-han,ZHANG Min-wei,et al.Cost-effective analysis of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of bloodstream infection[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2013,15(4):603.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2013.06.016]
[2]黄凤楼,刁孟元,钱海飞,等.降钙素原及内毒素对腹腔感染脓毒症患者预后的评估[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2014,16(02):147.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2014.02.011]
 HUANG Feng-lou,DIAO Meng-yuan,QIAN Hai-fei,et al.Prognostic value of procalcitonin and endotoxin concentrations for intra-abdominal sepsis[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2014,16(4):147.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2014.02.011]
[3]刘 瑜,方 放,黄 方.糖皮质激素受体基因多态性与脓毒症临床转归的相关性研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2015,17(06):575.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.06.005]
 LIU Yu,FANG Fang,HUANG Fang..Association of polymorphisms in glucocorticoid receptor with outcome of sepsis in a Chinese Han population[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(4):575.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.06.005]
[4]郭剑,雷洁洁,章柏平,等.脓毒症患者连续性肾替代治疗时机选择及预后比较[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(01):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.01.008]
 GUO Jian,LEI Jie-jie,ZHANG Bo-ping,et al.Comparison of timing and prognosis of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2018,20(4):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.01.008]
[5]窦燕,郭以河,孔晓飞,等.创伤弧菌脓毒症1例报道并文献复习[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(01):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.01.018]
[6]李勇,宋薇.连续性血液净化联合益气活血法对脓毒症伴心肌功能障碍患者的临床疗效观察[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(03):225.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.03.001]
 LI Yong,SONG Wei.The clinical efficacy of continuous blood purification combined with Yiqi Huoxue for the sepsis patients with myocardial dysfunction[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2018,20(4):225.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.03.001]
[7]林青伟,宋景春,曾庆波,等.大黄素对脓毒症大鼠凝血紊乱治疗的作用[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(05):464.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.05.004]
 LIN Qing-wei,SONG Jing-chun,ZENG Qing-bo,et al.Effect ofemodin on coagulation disorders of septic rats[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2018,20(4):464.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.05.004]
[8]谢醒文,杨振宁,葛鑫,等.脓毒症相关凝血功能障碍对脓毒症患者预后的评估价值[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2020,22(2):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.02.011]
 XIE Xing wen,YANG Zhen ning,GE Xin,et al.A clinical research on relationship between sepsisassociated coagulopathy and prognosis in patients with sepsis[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2020,22(4):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.02.011]
[9]钟林翠,宋景春,姜峻,等.血小板聚集率在评价脓毒症患者血小板功能及预后中的价值[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2020,22(3):249.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.03.006]
 ZHONG Lin-cui,SONG Jing-chun,JIANG Jun,et al.Clinical study on platelet aggregation to evaluate platelet function and prognosis in patients with sepsis[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2020,22(4):249.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.03.006]
[10]曾庆波,宋景春,钟林翠,等.严重创伤与脓毒症患者凝血功能紊乱的比较研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2020,22(4):367.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.04.007]
 ZENG Qing-bo,SONG Jing-chun,ZHONG Lin-cui,et al.Comparation of coagulation dysfunction between severe trauma and sepsis patients[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2020,22(4):367.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2020.04.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81701894,82102311)
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-06