|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈卫伶,武彦萍,穆凌光.不同时间行背阔肌皮瓣乳房重建术对乳腺癌患者的结局影响[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2022,24(4):362-366.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.04.006]
　CHEN Wei-ling,WU Yan-ping,MU Ling-guang.The effect of latissimus dorsi reconstruction at different times on the outcome of breast cancer cases[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2022,24(4):362-366.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.04.006]
点击复制

不同时间行背阔肌皮瓣乳房重建术对乳腺癌患者的结局影响()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第24卷
期数:
2022年4期
页码:
362-366
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The effect of latissimus dorsi reconstruction at different times on the outcome of breast cancer cases
作者:
陈卫伶; 武彦萍; 穆凌光
作者单位：054000邢台，邢台医学高等专科学校第一附属医院头颈乳腺外科（陈卫伶、武彦萍、穆凌光）
Author(s):
CHEN Wei-ling;  WU Yan-ping;  MU Ling-guang
（Department of Head, Neck and Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai 054000, Hebei, China）
关键词:
乳腺癌手术; 背阔肌皮瓣重建; 结局; 生活质量; 个性化选择
Keywords:
breast cancer surgery;  latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction;  outcome;  quality of life;  personalized choice
分类号:
R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.04.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探究不同时间段行背阔肌皮瓣乳房重建术对乳腺癌手术治疗患者的结局影响。方法选取2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日于邢台医学高等专科学校第一附属医院甲乳外科行乳腺癌手术背阔肌皮瓣乳房重建治疗的患者85例，根据乳房重建的时间分为组（重建后放疗）58例及组（放疗后重建）27例，比较2组患者并发症的发生率、美学评分、术后BREAST-Q评分及生活质量评分，同时比较二期组患者术前及等待期间患者的主观幸福感、身体心像及性健康评分，并采用logistic分析患者选择重建时间的影响因素。结果一期组患者并发症发生率较组高，但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；而美学评分、术后BREAST-Q评分及生活质量评分较术前均提高，但组间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；与术前比较，二期组患者等待期间的主观幸福感[（66.77±2.97)分 vs (61.24±2.40）分]、身体心像[（9.01±2.18)分 vs (8.12±1.92）分]及性健康评分[(31.09±3.33)分 vs (28.17±3.28)分]明显降低（均P＜0.05）；同时logistic分析显示年龄＜45周岁、存在经济压力、高中及以上学历以及居住地城市均是患者选择二期重建的影响因素。结论同期行背阔肌皮瓣乳房重建并未增加并发症发生率，同时不同时间段对患者术后的美学评分、术后BREAST-Q评分及生活质量评分无影响；而重建则会降低患者的主观幸福感、身体心像及性健康评分，同时logistic分析显示患者选择重建时间与多因素相关，可见乳腺癌术后背阔肌皮瓣重建应从患者特征出发，选择个性化的重建时机。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap on breast cancer patients with operation treatment at different time periods.MethodsThe clinical data of 58 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery with latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 were prospectively analyzed. According to the time of breast reconstruction, they were divided into a first-stage group (58 cases after reconstruction and radiotherapy) and a second-stage (after radiotherapy) reconstruction group (27 cases). The incidence of adverse reactions, aesthetic scores, postoperative BREAST- Q score and quality of life score, and the subjective well-being, body image and sexual health scores of patients in the two-stage reconstruction group before and during the waiting period were compared, and the influencing factors of patients’ choice of reconstruction time were analyzed by logistic regression.ResultsThe incidence of adverse reactions in the first-stage reconstruction group was higher than that in the second-stage reconstruction group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The patients’ subjective well-being [（66.77±2.97) vs (61.24±2.40）], body-mind image [（9.01±2.18) vs (8.12±1.92）] and sexual health score during the waiting period of the patients in the two-stage reconstruction group [(31.09±3.33) vs (28.17±3.28)] was significantly weaker than preoperative (all P<0.05). At the same time, logistic analysis showed that age <45 years old, financial pressure, high school education or above, and city of residence were all patients’ choice for the second stage reconstruction factors.ConclusionBreast reconstruction of the latissimus dorsi flap in the same period does not increase the adverse reaction rate. There is no effect on the postoperative aesthetic score, postoperative BREAST-Q score and quality of life score of the patient, while the second-stage reconstruction will increase the patient’s subjective well-being, physical image and sexual health score of the injured patient. The patient’s choice of reconstruction time is related to multiple factors. It can be seen that the reconstruction of latissimus dorsi flap after breast cancer surgery can be based on the characteristics of the patient and choose a personalized reconstruction opportunity.

参考文献/References:

[1]Bannour I, Briki R, Zrairi F, et al. Breast cancer in the Maghreb: epidemiology and control strategies[J]. Tunis Med，2018，96(10-11):658-666.
[2]Ito H, Matsuo K. Molecular epidemiology, and possible real-world applications in breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer，2016，23(1):33-38.
[3]Xu C, Wang Y, Yang H,et al.Association Between Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Web-Based Data in China: Infodemiology Study[J]. J Med Internet Res， 2019，21(1):e10677.
[4]毛婷,毛玲.PD-1/PD-L1免疫检查点抑制剂治疗三阴性乳腺癌的研究进展[J].东南国防医药,2021,23(5):511-515.
[5]陈雨秋.早期乳腺癌的术中放疗进展[J].医学研究生学报,2021,34(5):549-554.
[6]Qiu H, Xu WH, Kong J,et al. Effect of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on operation index, symptom checklist-90 score and prognosis in patients with early breast cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore)，2020，99(11):e19279.
[7]Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL, et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study[J]. Breast, 2018, 37: 72-79.
[8]Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S, et al. A comparison of psychological response, body image, sexuality, and quality of life between immediate and delayed autologous tissue breast reconstruction[J].Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 138(4): 772-780.
[9]Albino FP, Patel KM, Smith JR, et al. Delayed versus delayedimmediate autologous breast reconstruction: A blinded evaluation of aesthetic outcomes[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2014, 41(3): 264-270.
[10]Chen CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring quality of life in Chin J Breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Breast J, 2010, 16(6):587-559.
[11]Schag CA，Ganz P，Heinrich RL.Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system-short form （ CARES-SF）.A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument [J].Cancer, 199,68(6):1406 -1413.
[12]Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, et al. A body image scale for use with cancer patients［J］. Eur J Cancer, 2001,37(2):189-197.
[13]曹林,陈晓良,李倩.18F-FDG PET/CT最大标准摄取值与局部晚期乳腺癌临床病理特征及预后的相关性[J].东南国防医药,2021,23(1):28-31.
[14]O’Rorke MA,Murray lJ,Brand JS,et al.The value of adj uvant radiotherapy on survival and recurrence in tr-i ple-negative breast cancer:A systematic review and metaanalysis of 5507 patients[J].Cancer Treat Rev,2016,47:12-21.
[15]Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004,114(4): 950-960.
[16]Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Dumanian GA, et al. Outcomes of immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction followed by reconstruction of choice in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy[J]. AnnPlast Surg, 2014, 72(3): 274-278.
[17]El-Sabawi B, Ho AL, Sosin M, et al. Patient-centered outcomes of breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A comprehensive review of the literature[J]. J PlastReconstr Aesthet Surg, 2017, 70(6): 768-780.
[18]阮飞燕.乳腺癌患者品格优势对主观幸福感的影响：积极应对方式和领悟社会支持的链式中介作用[D].合肥：安徽医科大学,2020.
[19]Cordova LZ, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: A systematic review[J].Gland Surg, 2019, 8(4): 441-451.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：邢台市科技计划项目（2019ZC238）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-06