|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]俞新胜,肖 波,汪 普,等.微创锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2011,13(05):399-401.
　YU Xin-sheng,XIAO Bo,WANG Pu,et al.The efficacy of the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis on the treatment of the proximal humerus fractures[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2011,13(05):399-401.
点击复制

微创锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效分析()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第13卷
期数:
2011年05期
页码:
399-401
栏目:
出版日期:
2011-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The efficacy of the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis on the treatment of the proximal humerus fractures
文章编号:
1672-271X(2011)05-0399-03
作者:
俞新胜; 肖 波; 汪 普; 杨淮河; 丁 剑
330002 江西南昌，解放军94医院骨科
Author(s):
YU Xin-sheng; XIAO Bo; WANG Pu; YANG Huai-he; DING Jian
Department of Orthopedics Surgery,94 Hospital of PLA,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330002,China
关键词:
肱骨近端骨折; 微创; 锁定钢板; 内固定
Keywords:
proximal humerus fracture;  minimally invasive;  locking plate;  internal fixation
分类号:
R683.41
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨微创锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效。方法 应用锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端NeerⅢ、Ⅳ型骨折62例，随机分为微创组30例，应用锁定钢板微创治疗；传统组32例，应用切开复位锁定钢板内固定。记录比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、Neer评分及骨折愈合时间。结果 微创组与传统组手术时间分别为(80.20±12.41)min和(122.50±20.20)min，术中出血量分别为(164.67±35.21)ml和(330.94±84.71)ml，切口长度分别为(9.07±1.05)cm和(15.56±1.24)cm，Neer评分分别为(90.40±7.96)分和(82.63±8.64)分。两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、Neer评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。微创组与传统组骨折愈合时间分别为(18.53±3.22)周和(18.22±3.72)周，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 微创锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折能完成肱骨近端NeerⅢ、Ⅳ型骨折治疗，并获得满意效果。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the efficacy of the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis on the treatment of the proximal humerus fractures. Methods Sixty-two cases of Neer Ⅲ and Ⅳ proximal humeral fractures were treated with the locking proximal humerus plate. They were randomly divided into two groups: minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis in 30 cases (minimally invasive group),and the traditional anteromedial incision approach in 32 cases (traditional group).All fractures were fixated with the locking proximal humerus plates. The operation time,the blood loss,the incision length,the postoperative Neer score,the healing time of bone were recorded. All the data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 statistical software. Results The mean operative time was (80.20±12.41)min and (122.50±20.20)min in minimally invasive group and traditional group (P<0.05). The blood loss was (164.67±35.21)ml and (330.94±84.71)ml (P<0.05). The incision lengths were (9.07±1.05)cm and (15.56±1.24)cm (P<0.05),and the Neerscores were (90.40±7.96) and (82.63±8.64) in minimally invasive group and raditional group (P<0.05).The fracture healing time was (18.53±3.22 )week and (18.22±3.72 )week in minimally invasive group and traditional group. There was no statistical difference(P>0.05). Conclusion The treatment of Neer Ⅲ and Ⅳ proximal humeral fracture with the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis is a perfectly innovational method.

参考文献/References:

[1]Neer CS.Displaced proximal humeral fracture. part I.Classification and eaeluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am)，1970，52(6):1077-1089.
[2]俞新胜,肖 波,汪 普,等.锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折疗效分析[J].东南国防医药,2009,11(3):206-208.
[3]范广峰,孟庆国,成大志,等.肩前小切口解剖钢板固定治疗移位肱骨外科颈骨折[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2008,16(10):55.
[4]Gardner MJ,Griffith MH,Dines JS,et al.The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2005,43(4):123-129.
[5]张 岩，杨铁毅，刘树义,等.应用锁定接骨板微创固定治疗肱骨近端骨折31例初步随访分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(12):898-990.
[6]尚 咏，伍 骥，赵旭红,等.小切口与传统术式治疗肱骨外科颈骨折疗效比较[J].山西医科大学学报,2010,41(3):265-267.
[7]黄海晶，庞贵根，张铁良，等.锁定钢板治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折的临床分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2008,16(18):1364-1366.
[8]王永华，吕福润，付万有,等.锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2009,24(10):1545-1547.
[9]Agudelo J,Schurmann M,Stahel P,et al.Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locked plates[J].J Orthop Trauma,2007,21(10):676-681.

相似文献/References:

[1]储旭东,周 敏,蔡福金,等.老年肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗及疗效探讨[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2012,14(06):538.
[2]陈 烁,徐若男,蔡筱松,等.微创锁定接骨板治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2012,14(05):432.
　CHEN Shuo,XU Ruo-nan,CAI Xiao-song,et al.Minimally invasive locking proximal humerus plate in treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2012,14(05):432.
[3]俞新胜,肖 波,汪 普,等.锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折 疗效分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2009,11(03):206.
　YU Xin-sheng,XIAO Bo,WANG Pu,et al.Analysis on the efficacy of the treatment with Locking Proximal Humeral Plate for Neer III and Ⅳ Proximal Humeral Fracture[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2009,11(05):206.
[4]韦韦,刘宏,许罡,等.体系部队官兵原发性手汗症的非气管插管微创手术治疗[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(02):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.02.008]
　WEI Wei,LIU Hong,XU Gang,et al.Treatment ofpalmar hyperhidrosis by non-intubated anesthesia and minimally invasive surgery of our troops[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2018,20(05):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.02.008]
[5]吴浩,季明亮综述,陆军审校.老年肱骨近端骨折的治疗研究进展[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(05):535.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.05.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-09-20