|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]褚 健,邓晓俊,郎根强,等.980 nm二极管激光与等离子经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的应用比较[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2016,18(03):253-255,302.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2016.03.009]
　CHU Jian,DENG Xiao-jun,LANG Gen-qiang,et al.Comparison of the diode laser and the transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2016,18(03):253-255,302.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2016.03.009]
点击复制

980 nm二极管激光与等离子经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的应用比较()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第18卷
期数:
2016年03期
页码:
253-255,302
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the diode laser and the transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
作者:
褚 健1; 邓晓俊2; 郎根强1; 章益峰1; 庄剑秋1; 曹建伟1; 陈元贵1; 黄 钢1; 张 炯1; 储传敏1
1. 200081上海，解放军411医院泌尿外科；2. 201318上海，上海浦东新区周浦医院泌尿外科
Author(s):
CHU Jian1; DENG Xiao-jun2; LANG Gen-qiang1; ZHANG Yi-feng1; ZHUANG Jian-qiu1; CAO Jian-wei1; CHEN Yuan-gui1; HUANG Gang1; ZHANG Jiong1; CHU Chuan-min1.
1. Department of Urology, 411 Hospital of PLA, Shanghai, 200081, China; 2. Department of Urology,Pudong New Area Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai，201318，China
关键词:
前列腺增生; 经尿道前列腺电切术; 激光; 等离子
Keywords:
benign prostatic hyperplasia;  transurethral resection of prostate;  laser;  plasma
分类号:
R697.32
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2016.03.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较980 nm二极管激光与等离子在经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生中的安全性、有效性及术后随访结果。方法 将64例良性前列腺增生的患者随机分为两组，分别采用980 nm二极管激光（激光组）或等离子（等离子组）经尿道前列腺剜除术，比较两组患者年龄、前列腺大小、手术时间、术中出血量以及术前术后、电解质变化情况、前列腺症状评分、最大尿流率、残余尿量等。结果 两组患者年龄、前列腺大小、术前前列腺症状评分、最大尿流率、残余尿量等指标差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。激光组手术时间（68±15.4）min，术后血红蛋白下降（4.8±1.0）g/L，患者术后平均留置导尿时间3.1 d。等离子组手术时间（81.2±16.9）min，术后血红蛋白下降（8.6±1.8）g/L，患者术后平均留置导尿时间5.6 d。两组相比，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），表明激光组均优于等离子组。两组患者术前术后电解质Na＋下降无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。与术前相比，两组术后第1、6个月前列腺症状评分、最大尿流率、残余尿量等指标差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组患者均顺利完成手术，无输血事件及电切综合征发生。结论 980 nm二极管激光与等离子经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生，均安全有效，但980 nm二极管激光血红蛋白下降更少，手术时间和留置导尿管时间更短。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the validity and safety of diode laser and transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. Methods 64 BPH patients treated with transurethral enucleation of the prostate were divided randomly into 2 groups by diode laser (diode laser group) or plasma kinetic (plasma group) respectively. Patients’ age, prostate size, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative and postoperative changes of electrolyte, prostate symptom score, maximum urinary flow rate and residual urine volume of the two groups were recorded and compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference in patients’ age, size of the prostate, preoperative prostate symptom score, maximum urinary flow rate and residual urine volume of two groups (P>0.05). Laser group average operation time was （68±15.4）min, postoperative hemoglobin decreased to （4.8±1.0）g/L, and average postoperatively in patients with indwelling catheter time was 3.1 d. Plasma group average operation time was （81.2±16.9）min, postoperative hemoglobin dropped to （8.6±1.8）g/L, average postoperatively in patients with indwelling catheter time was 5.6 d. There was statistically significant difference (P<0.05), indicating that the laser group were better than plasma group. Two groups of patients with preoperative postoperative electrolyte Na+ was not significantly different (P>0.05). Compared with the preoperative, two groups of 1, 6 months after prostate symptom score, maximum urinary flow rate, residual urine volume indicators such differences were significant different (P<0.05). Two groups of patients were successfully completed surgery without blood transfusion and cutting syndrome. Conclusion 980 nm diode laser and transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia are safe and effective, but hemoglobin decreased less, indwelling catheter time is shorter with 980 nm diode laser.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ustinov DV, Kholtobin DP, Kul’chavenia EV, et al. The use of laser vaporization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Urologiia, 2013，(4): 74-76, 78-79.
[2] Tasc AI, Ilbey YO, Tugcu V, et al. Transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar resectoscope: single-surgeon experience and long-term results of after 3589 procedures[J]. Urology, 2011, 78 (5): 1151-1155.
[3] Reich O,Corvin S, Oberneder R,et al.In vitro comparison of transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP),resection of the prostate(TURP),and vaporization resection of the prostate(TUVRP) [J].Urol Res, 2002, 30 (1):15-20.
[4] Bach T, Muschter R, Sroka R,et al. Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences[J].Eur Urol,2012,61(2): 317-325.
[5] Benejam-Gual JM, Sanz-Granda A, Budía A,et al.Multicenter study on costs associated with two surgical procedures: GreenLight XPS 180 W versus the Gold standard transurethral resection of the prostate[J].Actas Urol Esp,2014,38(6):373-377. [6] Gu X,Vricella GJ,Spaliviero M,et al.Does size really matter?The impact of prostate volume on the efficacy and safety of GreenLight HPSTM laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(5): 525-530.
[7] Sun N, Fu Y, Tian T, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014, 46(7): 1277-1282.
[8] Yang Z, Wang X, Liu T. Thulium laser enucleation versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 18-month follow-up[J]. Urology, 2013, 81(2): 396-400.
[9] 仇让学，孟庆超，彭荣军，等.经尿道等离子前列腺双极电切术联合腔内剜除法治疗前列腺增生[J].东南国防医药，2009,11(2)：153-154.
[10] Yang SS, Hsieh CH,Lee YS, et al.Diode laser (980 nm) enucleation of the prostate: a promising alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate [J].Lasers Med Sci,2013,28(2): 353-360.
[11] Liu J,Kang SS,Zhang XJ,et al.980 nm diode laser vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue,2013,19(5):422-424.
[12] Kim Y,Seong YK,Kim IG,et al.Twelve-Month follow-up results of photoselective vaporization of the prostate with a 980 nm diode laser for treatment of benign hyperplasia[J].Korean J Urol,2013,54(10):677-681.

相似文献/References:

[1]仇让学,孟庆超,彭荣军,等.经尿道等离子双极电切术联合腔内剜除法 治疗前列腺增生症[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2009,11(02):153.
[2]计小平.老年前列腺增生72例临床分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2008,10(03):215.
[3]陈宇东,杜 钰,韩 刚.经尿道2 μm激光分割式汽化切除术治疗前列腺增生的学习曲线分析[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2016,18(01):32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2016.01.009]
　CHEN Yu-dong,DU Yu,HAN Gang..Learning curve of 2 μm laser dividing vaporesection for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2016,18(03):32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2016.01.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-05-20