|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李凯,马锴,王金龄.富血小板纤维蛋白结合引导骨组织再生在拔牙位点保存术中的应用[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2018,20(03):263-266.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.03.010]
 LI Kai,MA Kai,WANG Jin-ling.Application observation of platelet-rich fibrin combined with guided bone regeneration in the site preservation after tooth extraction[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2018,20(03):263-266.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.03.010]
点击复制

富血小板纤维蛋白结合引导骨组织再生在拔牙位点保存术中的应用()

《医学研究与战创伤救治》(原医学研究生学报)[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第20卷
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
263-266
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-05-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application observation of platelet-rich fibrin combined with guided bone regeneration in the site preservation after tooth extraction
作者:
李凯马锴王金龄
作者单位:572000三亚,三亚市人民医院口腔科(李凯、马锴、王金龄)
Author(s):
LI KaiMA KaiWANG Jin-ling
(Department of Stomatology,Sanya City People′s Hospital,Sanya 572000,Hainan,China)
关键词:
富血小板纤维蛋白引导骨组织再生拔牙位点保存术牙槽骨吸收愈合
Keywords:
platelet-rich fibrin guided bone regeneration site preservation alveolar bone resorption healing
分类号:
R782.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2018.03.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨富血小板纤维蛋白(platelet-rich fibrin, PRF)在拔牙后引导骨组织再生(guided bone regeneration,GBR)位点保存术中的应用。方法 选取三亚市人民医院2015年1月至2017年1月期间收治的拔牙后行GBR位点保存术患者60例为研究对象,根据就诊顺序依次编号,采用数字表法随机分为观察组和对照组各30例。微创拔牙后,植入Bio-Oss骨替代材料,观察组以PRF膜覆盖在其表面,对照组以海奥胶原膜覆盖在其表面。比较2组创面愈合时间、术后1周和术后2周创面愈合率,拔牙前和术后3个月牙槽骨高度和宽度,术后6个月组织学检查牙龈愈合情况和骨新生情况。结果 观察组创面愈合时间为(11.87±3.85)d,显著短于对照组的(17.41±4.36)d(P<0.05);观察组术后1周和2周创面愈合率分别为(68.21±7.57)%和(96.17±3.38)%,显著高于对照组[(44.52±7.13)%和(78.35±3.04)%,P<0.05];观察组术后3个月牙槽骨宽度减少(0.58±0.12)mm,牙槽骨高度减少(0.81±0.17)mm,显著少于对照组[(0.92±0.22)mm和(1.15±0.26)mm,P<0.05];术后6个月,观察组牙龈组织排列以及牙龈成分较对照组愈合更好,观察组新生骨百分比为(37.32±11.87)%,显著高于对照组的(28.48±8.59)%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PRF应用于拔牙后GBR位点保存术,可促进创面愈合,抑制牙槽骨吸收,促进新生骨形成。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the site preservation of guided bone regeneration (GBR) after tooth extraction.Methods 60 cases of patients treated with GBR site preservation after tooth extraction in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were selected for the study, and were numbered by the admission sequence and then divided into the observation group (n=30) and the control group (n=30) according to the random number table method. After the minimally invasive tooth extraction, Bio-Oss bone substitute material was implanted. The observation group was covered with PRF membrane on the surface and the control group was covered with sea oxide collagen membrane on its surface. The wound healing time, the healing rates at 1 week, 2 weeks after operation, and the height and width of alveolar bone before tooth extraction and at 3 months after operation were compared between the two groups.Results The wound healing time was (11.87±3.85)d in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group with (17.41±4.36) d (P<0.05). And the wound healing rates were (68.21±7.57)% and (96.17±3.38)% at 1 week, 2 weeks after operation, which were significantly higher than those in the control group[(4452±7.13)% and (78.35±3.04)%, P<0.05]. The decreases of width and the height of alveolar bone at 3 months after operation were (0.58±0.12) mm and (0.81±0.17) mm in the observation group, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(0.92±0.22) mm and (1.15±026) mm, P<0.05]. At 6 months after operation, the gingival tissue of the observation group better than that of the control group, and the percentage of newborn bone in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [(37.32±11.87)% vs (28.48±8.59)%, P<0.05].Conclusion PRF can promote wound healing and inhibit alveolar bone resorption in the GBR site preservation after tooth extraction.

参考文献/References:

[1]李一鸣, 尼加提·吐尔逊, 周晶,等. 骨诱导活性材料复合富血小板纤维蛋白在拔牙位点保存中的作用[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2015, 29(3):235-237.
[2]张森林, 毛天球. 富含血小板血浆在骨组织工程中的应用进展[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2006, 19(8):737-740.
[3]周红文, 刘向辉, 孙卫革. 磨牙残冠残根的保存治疗[J]. 东南国防医药, 2005, 7(5):368-368.
[4]李悦, 张燕婷, 何晶,等. 联合应用骨劈开、骨挤压术、引导骨组织再生技术并同期种植手术方案的短期临床疗效分析[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2016, 9(9):532-537.
[5]郭津源, 仲维剑, 柴松岭,等. 牙齿煅烧颗粒结合富血小板纤维蛋白修复骨缺损的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(11):1069-1072.
[6]万永, 赵峰, 聂国军,等. PRF在牙槽嵴位点保存应用中的CBCT观察[J]. 西南国防医药, 2015, 25(12):1355-1358.
[7]杨芳, 雷志敏, 王林虎. 微创拔牙后植入不同材料对牙槽窝保存技术的影响研究[J]. 中国美容医学杂志, 2017, 26(2):102-104.
[8]董露. 富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)诱导牙龈软组织修复再生的临床观察[D]. 四川医科大学, 2015.
[9]杨世茂, 王明国, 李静,等. 富血小板纤维蛋白与富血小板血浆体外释放生长因子的比较及其对脂肪干细胞增殖分化的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(6):641-644.
[10]顾杰林. 富血小板纤维蛋白用于口腔种植引导骨再生技术组织愈合效果分析[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2017, 7(1):48-50.
[11]李淑慧, 戴晓玮, 张文丽,等. 自体骨髓间充质干细胞复合富血小板纤维蛋白促进拔牙窝骨愈合[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2016, 20(1):3-7.
[12]徐庆. 富血小板纤维蛋白促进拔牙创愈合的Cochrane系统评价[D]. 西南医科大学, 2016.
[13]柳锋, 雷志敏. PRF联合珊瑚骨粉在前牙美学区拔牙位点保存的临床研究[J]. 西南国防医药, 2016, 26(6):643-646.
[14]Suttapreyasri S, Leepong N. Influence of platelet-rich fibrin on alveolar ridge preservation[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2013, 24(4):1088-1094.
[15]辛策, 胡青芳, 吕迪,等. PRF用于口腔种植GBR手术组织愈合效果初步研究[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2016, 3(4):87-90.
[16]李琦. 富血小板纤维蛋白对牙周膜前体细胞成骨分化的影响及机制研究[D]. 吉林大学, 2013.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-20