|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]邹守平,卢道云,叶力.经皮微创截骨矫形骨水泥灌注治疗老年陈旧性胸腰椎骨折的应用[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2021,23(05):497-500.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.05.011]
 ZOU Shou-ping,LU Dao-yun,YE Li.Percutaneous minimally invasive osteotomy and orthopedic bone cement perfusion in the treatment of old thoracolumbar fractures[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2021,23(05):497-500.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.05.011]
点击复制

经皮微创截骨矫形骨水泥灌注治疗老年陈旧性胸腰椎骨折的应用()

《医学研究与战创伤救治》(原医学研究生学报)[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2021年05
页码:
497-500
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Percutaneous minimally invasive osteotomy and orthopedic bone cement perfusion in the treatment of old thoracolumbar fractures
作者:
邹守平卢道云叶力
作者单位:316000舟山,解放军东部战区海军医院骨科(邹守平、卢道云、叶力)
Author(s):
ZOU Shou-ping LU Dao-yun YE Li
(Department of Orthopaedics, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, PLA, Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang, China)
关键词:
经皮微创截骨骨水泥灌注胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折陈旧性骨折临床疗效
Keywords:
percutaneous minimally invasive osteotomy bone cement infusion thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures old fractures clinical efficacy
分类号:
R683
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.05.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的分析并评估老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折行微创截骨矫形骨水泥灌注手术的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年6月解放军东部战区海军医院收治的老年陈旧性胸腰椎骨折51例患者的临床资料,其中采用微创截骨矫形骨水泥灌注治疗21例(微创组),药物保守治疗30例(保守组)。比较2组患者治疗前及治疗后1个月、3个月、6个月及12个月时的VAS评分、Oswestry功能障碍评分(ODI评分),治疗前及治疗后1个月、12个月随访时的椎体前后缘高度百分比及患者的满意度评分。结果所有患者均完成12个月以上随访,平均随访14.8个月。微创组出现1例轻度骨水泥渗漏、未出现神经症状。微创组治疗后1个月、3个月、6个月及12个月随访时的VAS评分、ODI评分,以及治疗后1个月、12个月随访时的椎体前后缘高度百分比均显著优于保守组(P<0.01),患者治疗的满意度评分亦高于保守组[(88.27±5.11)分 vs (65.35±3.71)分,P<0.01]。结论采用微创截骨矫形骨水泥灌注治疗老年陈旧性胸腰椎骨折,可以有效改善患者的临床症状,提高生活质量,具有相对的安全性和有效性,可作为临床治疗的选择方案之一。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive osteotomy and orthopedic bone cement infusion for elderly osteoporosis thoracolumbar fractures.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 51 elderly patients with old thoracolumbar fractures admitted to the Naval Hospital of the Eastern Theater of the People’s Liberation Army from January 2015 to June 2019. Among them, 21 cases were treated with minimally invasive osteotomy and orthopedic bone cement perfusion (minimally invasive group) , 30 cases were treated conservatively with drugs (conservative group). Compare the VAS scores, Oswestry dysfunction score (ODI score) before treatment and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment, before treatment and 1 month and 12 months after treatment The percentage of the height of the anterior and posterior edge of the vertebral body at the follow-up and the patient’s satisfaction score.ResultsAll patients completed follow-up of more than 12 months, with an average follow-up of 14.8 months. In the minimally invasive group, there was 1 case of mild bone cement leakage and no neurological symptoms. In the minimally invasive group, the VAS scores and ODI scores at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up after treatment, and the anterior and posterior vertebral height percentages at 1 month and 12 months after treatment were all significant It is better than the conservative group (P<0.01), and the satisfaction score of patients with treatment is also higher than that of the conservative group [(88.27±5.11) points vs (65.35±3.71) points, P<0.01].ConclusionThe use of minimally invasive osteotomy and orthopedic bone cement perfusion for the treatment of old thoracolumbar fractures in the elderly can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients and improve the quality of life. It has relative safety and effectiveness and can be invoked as one of the options for clinical treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]丁权, 殷翔, 姜复龄, 等. 非手术治疗与手术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折的疗效观察[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2019,28(7):565-568.
[2]马远征, 王以鹏, 刘强, 等.中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2018)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2018, 24(12):1541-1567.
[3]秦虎,何斌,王云华, 等.手法复位结合经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年新鲜骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的研究[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2015, 28(4):385-389.
[4]Tang J, Guo WC, Hu JF, et al.Unilateral and Bilateral Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic CompressionFractures[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2019, 29(10):946-950.
[5]钟远鸣, 张翼升, 李智斐, 等. 胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折时间与PVP术后临床疗效相关性的研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2018, 47(32):4134-4138.
[6]匡葱葱. 经皮椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松胸腰椎压缩性骨折分析[J]. 江西医药, 2019, 54(11):1363-1364.
[7]Hu KZ, Chen SC, Xu L. Comparison of percutaneous balloon dilation kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty in treatment for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2018, 22(S1):96-102.
[8]赵爱兵, 张春城, 孙武红, 等. 经皮椎体成形术(PVP)在治疗腰椎骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的临床应用价值[J]. 临床医药文献杂志, 2019, 23(6): 59.
[9]Du JP, Fan Y, Liu JJ, et al. The analysis of MSTMOVCF (Multi-segment thoracolumbar mild osteoporotic fractures surgery or conservative treatment) based on ASTLOF (the assessment system of thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture)[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):8185.
[10]Shi C, Zhang M, Cheng AY, et al. Percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with zoledronic acid infusion in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures in the elderly[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2018, 13:853-861.
[11]He G, Yu Q, Yang K, et al.Clinical application of percutaneous kyphoplasty under the guidance of DynaCT in the treatment of compression fractures ofthoracolumbar[J]. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 2019, 19(2):229-233.
[12]Wang WF, Lin CW, Xie CN, et al.The association between sarcopenia and osteoporotic vertebral compression refractures[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2019, 30(12):2459-2467.
[13]耿捷, 马虎升, 王雷. 经肋横突沟途径椎体成形术治疗胸椎骨质疏松性压缩性骨折80例[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2019, 27(8):73-75.
[14]Liu T, Li Z, Su Q, et al.Cement leakage in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with cortical defect using high-viscosity bone cement during unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty surgery[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(25):e7216.
[15]秦英, 原向伟, 梁胜根. 胸腰椎椎体成形术对老年骨质疏松性骨折的疗效分析[J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(22):22-24.
[16]王耿杰,倪连红,马良赟, 等. 骨质疏松性骨折预测方法的研究进展[J]. 东南国防医药, 2017, 19(5):513-516.
[17]罗建军, 王冰. 经皮椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的效果评价[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2016, 28(5):54-58.
[18]古劲雷. 手法联合经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折[J]. 吉林医学, 2016, 37(2):367-368.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-11