|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王刚,吴剑锋.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值、C反应蛋白和降钙素原在重症肺部感染患者中的早期诊断及预后评估价值[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2021,23(6):596-599.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.06.008]
　WANG Gang,WU Jian-feng.The value of NLR, CRP and PCT in clinical diagnosis and prognosis of severe pulmonary infection[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2021,23(6):596-599.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.06.008]
点击复制

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值、C反应蛋白和降钙素原在重症肺部感染患者中的早期诊断及预后评估价值()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第23卷
期数:
2021年6期
页码:
596-599
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The value of NLR, CRP and PCT in clinical diagnosis and prognosis of severe pulmonary infection
作者:
王刚; 吴剑锋
作者单位：210006南京，南京医科大学附属南京医院（南京市第一医院）医学检验科（王刚、吴剑锋）
Author(s):
WANG Gang;  WU Jian-feng
(Department of Clinical Laboratory, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China)
关键词:
重症肺部感染; 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值; C反应蛋白; 降钙素原
Keywords:
severe pulmonary infection; the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocyte count; C-reactive protein; procalcitonin
分类号:
R563.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2021.06.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨炎症指标中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值（NLR）、C反应蛋白（CRP）和降钙素原（PCT）对重症肺部感染患者早期诊断及预后评估的价值。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年10月南京医科大学附属南京医院收治的重症肺部感染患者46例(重症组)的临床资料，选取同期普通肺部感染患者46例作为对照组。对比分析2组患者治疗前及治疗后7 d的NLR、CRP和PCT水平，随访30 d，统计重症肺部感染患者预后情况。结果重症组治疗前NLR、CRP及PCT水平显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析显示NLR对重症组诊断灵敏度为78.26％，特异性为71.74％；CRP对重症组诊断灵敏度为93.48％，特异性为69.57％；PCT对重症组诊断灵敏度为95.65％，特异性为76.09％；三者联合诊断敏感度为灵敏度为98.13％，特异性为90.05％，高于单独诊断（P<0.05）；随访结果显示死亡者NLR、CRP及PCT的水平均显著高于部分缓解者和完全缓解者（P<0.05）；而部分缓解者NLR、CRP及PCT的水平均显著高于完全缓解者（P<0.05）。结论NLR、CRP和PCT对于重症肺部感染的临床诊断及预后情况评估均具有一定的应用价值，其中PCT具有较高的临床参考价值，且NLR+CRP+PCT 联合检测能够提高重症肺部感染的诊断灵敏度，具有较高的临床预测价值，为指导临床治疗提供了有效的实验诊断依据。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of inflammatory markers including the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocyte count (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in early diagnosis and prognosis of patients with severe pulmonary infection.MethodsForty-six patients with severe pulmonary infection who were treated in our hospital from January 2019 to October 2020 were enrolled. Forty-six patients with concurrent common pulmonary infection were enrolled as the control group. The levels of NLR, CRP and PCT of all patients were measured before and after treatment. Patients were followed up for 30 days and their prognosis was evaluated.ResultsThe levels of NLR, CRP and PCT in the patients with severe pulmonary infection before treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of NLR were 78.26% and 71.74%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CRP in patients with severe pulmonary in- fection were 93.48% and 69.57%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PCT in patients with severe pulmonary infection were 95.65% and 76.09%, respectively. The combined detection of NLR, CRP and PCT levels improved the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity to 98.13％ and 90.05％ (P<0.05). Follow-up results showed that the levels of NLR, CRP and PCT in the death group were significantly higher than those in the partial response group and the complete response group (P<0.05). The levels of NLR, CRP and PCT in the partial remission group were significantly higher than those in the complete remission group (P<0.05).ConclusionNLR, CRP and PCT have certain application value in clinical diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of severe pulmonary infection, among which PCT has high clinical reference value and provides effective experimental diagnostic basis for guiding clinical treatment. In addition, the combined detection of NLR, CRP and PCT levels significantly improve the diagnostic value which will provide valuable information for clinical diagnosis.

参考文献/References:

[1]De Jager CP,Wever PC, Gemen EF, et al. The neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in patients with community-acquired pneumonia[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(10): e46561.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046561
[2]Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, Folesani G, et al. The association of serum procalcitonin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with pneumonia in elderly multimorbid patients with respiratory symptoms: retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2016, 16:16.
[3]Warusevitane A, Karunatilake D, Sim J, et al. Early Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Severe Stroke: Clinical Features and the Diagnostic Role of C Reactive Protein[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(3): e0150269.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150269
[4]Peschanski N, Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Mzabi L, et al. Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2016, 6(1):47.
[5]李丽娟，陈炜，古旭云，等. 血浆PCT和CRP水平的动态变化对脓毒症严重程度的评估及其相关性研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2013, 17(6):1010-1013.
[6]Meili M, Kutz A, Briel M, et al. Infection biomarkers in primary care patients with acute respiratory tract infections-comparison of Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2016, 16:43.
[7]Travaglino F, Russo V, De Berardinis B, et al. Thirty and ninety days mortality predictive value of admission and in -hospital procalcitonin and mid -regional pro-adrenomedullin testing in patients with dyspnea. Results from the VERyfing Dyspnea trial[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2014, 32(4):334-334.
[8]Zhu JJ, Liu LJ. Analysis of factors influenced by the effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with differentseverities[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 20(22):4775-4781.
[9]王静,宋义琴,李文慧,等.血清TNF-α、IL-6、CRP、sICAM-1、PCT水平变化在评估儿童重症肺炎中的应用价值[J]. 河北医药,2021,43(6):876-878，882.
[10]Brodská H, Malícˇková K, Adámková V, et al. Significantly higherprocalcitonin levels could differentiate Gram-negative sepsis from Gram-positive and fungal sepsis[J]. Clin Exp Med, 2013, 13(3): 165-170．
[11]Magrini L, Gagliano G, Travaglino F, et al. Comparison between white blood cell count procalcitonin and C reactive protein as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of infection or sepsis in patients presenting to emergency department[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2014, 52(10):1465-1472.
[12]洪骏, 唐海霞, 戴雯,等. 中性粒细胞中毒颗粒与降钙素原联合检测对细菌性肺炎诊断的意义[J]. 东南国防医药, 2015, 17(2):146-148.
[13]徐龙芳. 细菌性感染性疾病与病毒性感染性疾病小儿hsCRP、血常规检验结果的对比[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(21):143-145.
[14]杨洁, 丁少川, 梁静. C反应蛋白、降钙素原在重型颅脑损伤患者肺部感染早期诊断价值[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志, 2017, 32(4):457-458.
[15]曹昌魁，刘锐，李亮，等.创伤患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和乳酸水平与创伤严重程度及预后的关系[J]. 医学研究生学报，2020,33(8):830-834.
[16]徐方明, 白璐, 张森,等. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术后发生全身炎症反应综合征的列线图模型建立[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2019，32(9):968-972.
[17]邢铭芬, 蔡云祥, 屠春平, 等. 中性粒-淋巴细胞比值在成人急性上呼吸道感染病原鉴别诊断中的意义[J]. 现代实用医学, 2015, 27(6): 791-793.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-12-15