|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]蒋辉,詹刚,周骏,等.两种微创术式治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效影响[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2023,25(1):1-6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2023.01.001]
　JIANG Hui,ZHAN Gang,ZHOU Jun,et al.Efficacy of ERCP and LCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2023,25(1):1-6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2023.01.001]
点击复制

两种微创术式治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效影响()
分享到62.8K

《医学研究与战创伤救治》（原医学研究生学报）[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2023年1期
页码:
1-6
栏目:
基础研究
出版日期:
2023-05-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy of ERCP and LCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy
作者:
蒋辉; 詹刚; 周骏; 李中虎; 马丹丹; 孙炜玮; 谢俊
作者单位：430070武汉，中部战区总医院普通外科（蒋辉、詹刚、周骏、李中虎、马丹丹、孙炜玮）；400042重庆，陆军特色医学中心肝胆胰外科（谢俊）
Author(s):
JIANG Hui1;  ZHAN Gang1;  ZHOU Jun1;  LI Zhonghu1;  MA Dandan1;  SUN Weiwei1;  XIE Jun2
（1.Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan 430070,Hubei，China;2.Department of Hepaticbiliary-pancreatic Surgery, Army Medical Center, Chongqing 400042,China）
关键词:
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术; 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术; 胆囊切除术; 胆总管结石; 疗效; 应激反应; 白细胞计数; 谷氨酰转移酶
Keywords:
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography;  laparoscopic choledochotomy;  cholecystectomy;  choledocholithiasis;  efficacy;  stress response;  white blood cell count;  glutamyltransferase
分类号:
R657.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2023.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）与腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术（LCBDE）治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效及对应激反应、白细胞计数（WBC）及谷氨酰转移酶（GGT）的影响。方法回顾性分析2019年5月-2021年11月中部战区总医院收治的98例胆囊切除术后胆总管结石患者的临床资料，根据手术方式分为ERCP组（行ERCP+内镜十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术（EST）治疗，37例）和LCBDE组（行LCBDE治疗，61例）。比较2组患者手术相关指标、术后并发症发生情况以及手术前后应激反应指标[C-肽（C-P）、皮质醇（Cor）、去甲肾上腺素（NE）、促肾上腺皮质激素（ACTH）]、WBC、GGT水平变化。结果ERCP组患者手术时间[(60.54±7.74) min vs (109.44±10.71) min]、术中出血量[(5.73±1.67)mL vs (30.92±5.16)mL]、术后排气时间[(12.30±3.77)h vs (18.54±4.69)h]、下床活动时间[(1.11±0.37)d vs (1.44±0.50)d]、术后住院时间[(5.14±1.09)d vs (6.28±1.28)d]、治疗费用[(2.51±0.51)万元 vs (3.08±0.57)万元]均小于LCBDE组患者（均P<0.05），2组患者的结石残留率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后24 h、72 h，2组患者血清C-P、Cor、NE、ACTH、WBC水平均高于术前（均P<0.05），且ERCP组患者上述指标均高于LCBDE组患者（均P<0.05）；术后24 h、72 h、7 d，2组患者血清GGT水平均低于术前水平（均P<0.05）。2组患者术后并发症总发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效及安全性均尚可，LCBDE相较ERCP对患者的应激反应指标、WBC及GGT水平影响更小，临床应用价值相对更高，但仍需根据患者实际情况选择最优术式。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic choledocholithotomy (LCBDE) in the treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy and their response to stress, white blood cell count (WBC) and glutamyltransferase (GGT).MethodsA total of 98 patients with choledocholithiasis after cholecystectomy who were admitted from May 2019 to November 2021 in General Hospital of Central Theater Command were enrolled, and were divided into ERCP group (ERCP + endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) treatment, 37 cases) and LCBDE group (LCBDE treatment, 61 cases). The operation-related indicators, postoperative complications, and stress response indicators [C-peptide (C-P), cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) before and after surgery, WBC, GGT levels were compared.ResultsThe operation time[(60.54±7.74) min vs (109.44±10.71) min], intraoperative blood loss[(5.73±1.67)mLvs (30.92±5.16)mL], postoperative exhaust time[(12.30±3.77)h vs (18.54±4.69)h], ambulation time[(1.11±0.37)d vs (1.44±0.50)d], postoperative hospital stay[(5.14±1.09)d vs (6.28±1.28)d], and treatment cost[(2.51±0.51) million vs (3.08±0.57) million] in the ERCP group were less than those in the LCBDE group (All P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the residual rate of stones among the patients (P>0.05). At the 24 h, 72 h after operation, the serum levels of C-P, Cor, NE, ACTH, and WBC in the two groups were higher than those before operation (All P<0.05).And the patients in the ERCP group were higher than those in the LCBDE group (All P<0.05). At 24 h, 72 h, and 7 d after the operation, the serum GGT levels in the two groups were lower than the preoperative level (All P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of ERCP and LCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy are acceptable. Compared with ERCP, LCBDE has less effect on the stress response index, WBC and GGT levels of patients, and its clinical application value is relatively higher. However , it is still necessary to select the optimal operation according to the actual situation of the patient

参考文献/References:

[1]庞永奎.胆囊切除术后迟发性胆总管结石的高风险因素研究[J].重庆医学,2020,49(S1):99-102.
[2]何恒正,周峥,尹清华,等.ERCP+LC和LC+LCBDE治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果比较[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(11):1889-1892.
[3]Lei CN,Lu TT,Yang WW,et al.Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Surg Endosc,2021,35(11):5918-5935.
[4]林师佈,杨彦,李望,等.分期内镜取石与一期腹腔镜胆总管切开取石治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的对比研究[J].广东医学,2018,39(6):907-911.
[5]Chae MK,Lee SH,Joo KR.Assessment of the possible risk factors for primary common bile duct stone recurrence after cholecystectomy[J].Surg Endosc,2021,35(12):6497-6504.
[6]Bradley A,Sami S,Hemadasa N,et al.Decision analysis of minimally invasive management options for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(12):5211-5222.
[7]张鑫,袁琪,高鹏程.腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查术与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的meta分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2019,26(10):1209-1216.
[8]Cano JG,Domper F.The best approach to treat concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. Is ERCP still needed?[J] Rev Esp Enferm Dig,2019,111(3):173-175.
[9]孔臣臣,张晓君,崔龙,等.LC联合LCBDE与联合ERCP治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效分析[J].贵州医药,2018,42(7):843-844.
[10]武俊光,姚胜娜,刘红斌.ERCP+EST与LCBDE+CBDE联合LC治疗老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J].肝胆外科杂志,2018,26(2):133-136.
[11]Lyu YX,Cheng YX,Li T,et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomyfor cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis[J].Surg Endosc,2019,33(10):3275-3286.
[12]易新平,钱巍巍.两种微创术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(3):198-202.
[13]汪浩.腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术后一期缝合对胆总管结石患者应激反应、胃肠功能及并发症的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2021,27(7):47-52.
[14]Landreh M,Jrnvall H.Biological activity versus physiological function of proinsulin C-peptide[J].Cell Mol Life Sci,2021,78(3):1131-1138.
[15]Wang GR,Wu Q,Liu WP,et al.Effect of Oxycodone hydrochloride combined with Dexmedetomidine on quality of recovery and stress response after general anesthesia in patients who had Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy[J].Pak J Med Sci,2021,37(5):1408-1413.
[16]王齐成,吕劲.不同手术方法对胆囊合并胆总管结石患者凝血功能及应激反应的影响分析[J].血栓与止血学,2021,27(2):285-286.
[17]谢江,柳晓丹,饶小龙,等.不同微创手术方法治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石疗效的比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(9):1121-1126.
[18]王春荣,郭豫吉,李长锋,等.LC联合LCBDE手术治疗胆囊合并胆总管结石对患者应激及凝血功能的影响[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2018,36(9):1118-1120,1144.
[19]Zhu JS,Li GY,Du P,et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis[J].Surg Endosc,2021,35(3):997-1005.
[20]胡云龙,宋正伟,龙昊,等.不同胆总管取石术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效比较[J].成都医学院学报,2021,16(1):46-49,53.
[21]姚利,陈先祥,涂华华,等.内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术与腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效比较[J].临床外科杂志,2018,26(2):121-123.
[22]齐伟,梁久银,张琦.LC联合LCBDE和LC联合ERCP在胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效分析[J].肝胆外科杂志,2021,29(1):39-42.
[23]陈钰,杜静虎,王东华,等.LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果比较[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2018,30(5):403-406.
[24]郝余庆,蒋徐维,丁俊.三种手术方案治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的疗效及对血清GGT ALP的影响[J].河北医学,2019,25(1):9-13.
[25]Zou Q,Ding Y, Li CS, et al.A randomized controlled trial of emergency LCBDE + LC and ERCP + LC in the treatment of choledocholithiasis with acute cholangitis[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2022,17(1):156-162.

相似文献/References:

[1]张银,张悦,陈炳芳,等.超声内镜引导与经皮肝穿刺胆道引流应用于梗阻性黄疸患者的疗效评价[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2022,24(2):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.02.005]
　ZHANG Yin,ZHANG Yue,CHEN Bing-fang,et al.Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2022,24(1):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2022.02.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金（81902501）
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-04-19