|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陆洋,阳文新,申红,等.无创正压通气治疗急性重症哮喘合并呼吸衰竭的疗效观察[J].医学研究与战创伤救治(原医学研究生学报),2015,17(05):481-483,510.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.05.010]
 LU Yang,YANG Wen-xin,SHEN Hong,et al.The efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure with severe asthma emergency[J].JOURNAL OF MEDICALRESEARCH —COMBAT TRAUMA CARE,2015,17(05):481-483,510.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.05.010]
点击复制

无创正压通气治疗急性重症哮喘合并呼吸衰竭的疗效观察()

《医学研究与战创伤救治》(原医学研究生学报)[ISSN:1672-271X/CN:32-1713/R]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
481-483,510
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure with severe asthma emergency
作者:
陆洋阳文新申红丁 华尹述旺
210002 江苏南京,解放军81医院急诊科
Author(s):
LU Yang YANG Wen-xin SHEN Hong DING Hua YIN Shu-wang.
Emergency Department, 81 Hospital of PLA, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
关键词:
无创正压通气急性重症哮喘呼吸衰竭临床疗效
Keywords:
noninvasive positive pressure ventilation acute severe asthma respiratory failure clinical efficacy
分类号:
R562.25;R563.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-271X.2015.05.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨采用无创正压通气治疗急性重症哮喘致呼吸衰竭的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析某院急诊科2009年6月-2014年5月收治的47例重症哮喘合并呼吸衰竭患者的 临床资料,分为对照组(26例)和观察组(21例),对照组采用吸氧、解痉、激素抗炎、平喘、祛痰等常规急救处理措施,观察组在对照组的基础上实施无创正压通气治疗。比较 两组疗效、血气指标、血清炎症因子指标。结果 入院时两组患者心率(HR)、呼吸(RR)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、酸碱值(pH值)、白细胞介素 -8(IL-8)、白细胞介素-17(IL-17)、嗜酸性粒细胞粒子蛋白(ECP)、中性粒细胞过氧化物酶(MPO)、巨噬细胞衍生趋化因子(MDC)差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后 24 h、72 h观察组HR、RR、PaCO2显著低于对照组(P<0.05),PaO2显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。72 h后观察组IL-8、IL-17、ECP、MPO、MDC均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。经过治 疗后观察组有效率(66.67%)显著高于对照组(34.62%)(P<0.05),观察组转入有创通气治疗率(28.57%)显著低于对照组(57.69%)(P<0.05),两组患者病死率差异无统计 学意义(P>0.05)。结论 无创正压通气治疗急性重症哮喘致呼吸衰竭患者较常规治疗能够显著改善患者血气、炎症因子指标,降低转有创机械通气治疗比例,提高临床疗效。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure caused by severe asthma.Methods Retrospective analysis were adopted in 47 cases of severe asthma patients with respiratory failure in the emergency department of hospital from June 2009 to May 2014.They were divided into control group (26 cases) and study group (21 cases) according to the treatment methods.The control group used oxygen, spasmolysis, anti-inflammatory, expectorant, and other routine emergency treatment measures.The study group was implement with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on the base of the control group.Compared indexes of curative effect, blood gas and serum inflammatory factors between the two groups.Results HR, RR, PaO2, PaCO2, PH value, IL-8, IL-17, ECP, MPO, MDC between the two groups of patients when admission were not significant (P>0.05); HR, RR number, PaCO2 value of the study group after treatment for 24 h and 48 h was significantly lower than control group (P<0.05) and PaO2 was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05).After treatment for 72 h, IL-8, IL-17, ECP, MPO, MDC of the study group were significantly lower than the conventional group patients (P<0.05).After treatment, the effective rate of 66.67% in study group was significantly higher than that 34.62% of the control group (P<0.05).The study group of 28.57% invasive ventilation proportion was significantly lower than that of 57.69% in the control group (P<0.05).Mortality between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05).Conclusion Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation may improved the patients blood, inflammatory cytokines indicators, reduce the proportion of invasive mechanical ventilation and improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure caused by severe asthma compared with conventional treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]石宗民.无创正压通气在重症哮喘患者中的应用效果分析[J].北方药学,2014,11(3):104-105.
[2]李 晶.卓宋明.孙俊生,等.双水平气道无创正压通气联合甲泼尼龙治疗中重度哮喘的疗效分析[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2013,16(5):702-704.
[3]中华医学会呼吸病分会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘防治指南[J].中华呼吸和结核杂志,2013,36(5):331-335.
[4]中华医学会呼吸病分会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘防治指南[J].中华呼吸和结核杂志,2004,27(10):717-719.
[5]于文清.无创正压通气在COPD、支气管哮喘和左心衰竭中的临床应用[J].临床肺科杂志,2012,17(2):331-333.
[6]闫玉忠.李秋波.探讨重症支气管哮喘应用机械通气的治疗效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版),2013,13(9):48-49.
[7]莫碧文,李 洁,韦江红.基质细胞衍生因子-1/CXC趋化因子受体4在支气管哮喘大鼠气道炎症及气道重塑中的作用[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2015,38(1):39-44.
[8]徐国民.金 薇.无创正压通气治疗中重度支气管哮喘发作[J].中国医药科学,2013,3(1):186-187.
[9]古 丽,江 涛.支气管哮喘的特异性免疫治疗进展[J].中华哮喘杂志(电子版),2013,7(6):439-442.
[10]林辉斌,李伟杰,苏伟强,等.无创正压通气并经管道雾化吸入治疗重症哮喘的疗效[J].广东医学,2012,33(11):1599-1601.
[11]宗晓福,刘云霞,王 琴.无创通气在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期治疗中的应用价值[J].东南国防医药,2007,9(4):253-254.
[12]高炎超.无创正压通气联合雾化吸入治疗重症哮喘疗效分析[J].检验医学与临床,2014,11(14):1956-1957.
[13]张昌红,刘雪梅,刘晓静.无创双水平气道正压通气治疗中重症支气管哮喘临床疗效分析[J].临床肺科杂志,2012,17(9):1559-1560.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-20